Vrghs jacob

Vrghs jacob (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
10 August 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


User was indefinitely blocked for copyright violations, has subsequently created socks here and on Commons carrying out the same copyvios Chindia (China-India) (talk · contribs) and Goldfinger123 (talk · contribs) are two. He's also been IP socking ever since his first block, but the ranges are too wide for us to block and collateral damage is also too high (checked by Jpgordon a couple of times before through talk page requests). Some of the IP socks used within a two week period a couple of months ago are listed at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Vrghs jacob. It's mostly a copyvio problem, I've protected a few pages and run through a clean up every few weeks on other pages, but it's a tedious process (MRG and I have spent too much time on this) and I'm open to other suggestions. This is a duck sock, but I'd like to see if there are any others around. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 16:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Confirmed the following are the same:

21 February 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


This user looks like sock puppet of Harishrawat11, who is Sockmaster, as he makes same page edits as Harishrawat11 edits and Nirmal95 also edited, but Nirmal95 and Nirmal2012mathew is a sockpuppet of Vrghs Jacob and Harishrawat11 is a sockpuppet of Blamecivil95 which is a sockpuppet of Vrghs jacob, so it appears as if this is an added account created by the same user.... Almost all edits are relating to Indian Tax or Administrative Sevices: *http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Davidjohn13&dir=prev&offset=20130217094327&target=Davidjohn13... The diffs are:

Thus I think Davidjohn13, Mejojospeh22, Harishrawat11, Blamecivil95, Nirmal95, Nirmal2012mathew are all the same editor or two editors at max supporting each other and distrupting Wikipedia.. So I wish to block them all.. YoyoJacob13 (talk) 09:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

If Harishrawat11 really is Vrghs jacob, then he complained about his own sockpuppetry to me back in November. (Longer version: a known sockpuppet of Vrghs jacob was persistently adding copyright-infringing text to Directorate General of Anti-Evasion. The sockpuppet was blocked, but the edits continued from an anonymous IP account. Harishrawat11 reverted the IP's edits, labelling them as sockpuppetry, and notified me on my user talk page. If both the IP account and Harishrawat11 are Vrghs jacob then perhaps he did this only to divert suspicion from the Harishrawat11 sockpuppet.) —Psychonaut (talk) 11:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says:  Confirmed:
Vinyashree (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is  Likely. T. Canens (talk) 10:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
30 April 2013
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

This WP:DUCK sock of User:Vrghs jacob was blocked long ago, but I'm listing it here for completeness. Psychonaut (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

07 May 2016

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

The registered account is a self-admitted sockpuppet; see edit summaries at [1] and [2]. The IPs are single-purpose accounts that do nothing but edit, or post messages about, articles freshly created by the registered account. A check for further sockpuppet accounts wouldn't hurt, as this sockmaster has been known to create an awful lot of them. (I'm particularly suspicious about the creators of articles edited by the other IPs that have recently edited Shruti Kataria's articles.) Psychonaut (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

28 October 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

I blocked Japanmomo for racist attacks, but also tagged as a possible sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vrghs jacob. The link to the earlier farm is quite strong. The new account Jamesbond112 was created after I blocked Japanmomo and has continued the same behavior -- (minus the racism) compare edit summaries -- [3] vs [4]; [5] vs [6]. Vrghs jacob has had multiple active socks at a time and therefore a check to uncover those would be beneficial. —SpacemanSpiff 04:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 April 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Disruptive editing to University of London, edit summaries are made in the similar way to Japanmomo and Jamesbond112 who heavily edited this article. Lack's engagement in talk page discussions. By edit contributions, seems to be interested in this university and Indian biographies. Diffs: [7] [8] [9] [10]

Probably more socks to be discovered Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

29 September 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Re-doing the category adds made by User:Jkk12, a blocked sock. Wikiacc () 00:26, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
More