Thantalteresco (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Thantalteresco (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Premier (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by XalD

• Thantalteresco was blocked becouse "Block evasion". Nonetheless, a Checkuser analysis was not done. ~~×α£đ~~^es 17:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Thantalteresco went to Spanish Wikipedia Village Pump searching for help [1]. He said that he is in Spain, not in Australia, and an SPI can solve it. ~~×α£đ~~^es 17:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• es:User:Thantalteresco and es:Special:Contributions/88.1.47.56 (a Spanish IP [2]) edited my Spanish Wikipedia User Talk page to confirm that Thantalteresco uses the IP 88.1.47.56. [3]. ~~×α£đ~~^es 16:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )

Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by ~~×α£đ~~^es 17:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

I'm not sure that I see anything for checkuser to do, here; requests to prove one's innocence are usually declined, and the accounts to compare against are  Stale either way. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

•  Clerk declined as a formality, per Luna. Nathan ^T 19:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

 Clerk note: All users have been blocked. — Jake Wartenberg 23:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.