Sunilseth15

Sunilseth15 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

19 July 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


There was enough behavioural evidence to tie Desibee55 and Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant (and therefore Carriearchdale) together but I'm requesting a CU for specifically Shyam Hewitt since the evidence occurs off site. Mkdwtalk 21:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Carlieson to the list after this SPA created an article about the individual in the last photo from the flickr account. Mkdwtalk 21:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

02 August 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This one is checkuser stale, but it created GoodCall which was subsequently deleted as part of the spam campaign by this sockmaster. BethNaught (talk) 10:39, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

I see little point in blocking an account that hasn't been used in six months. If the account resumes activity, you can of course refile.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think in a typical SPI we wouldn't block, but in light of the community ban against the editor, including all of their alternate accounts, I've gone ahead and blocked the account. There's fairly substantial behavioural evidence tying this one to the others. Mkdwtalk 16:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07 September 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Account which made one vaguely promotional page >2 years ago reactivates to question the deletion by me of one of the sockfarm's articles. This sleeper pattern fits some other socks and is very suspicious. Given this pattern, can we also have a general check for any other previously stale socks which may have reactivated. BethNaught (talk) 20:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
More