Both SCG, GWT, and LWU, have a similar editing style in that they change temporal ranges and taxonomy templates without consensus. Now, here are all the diffs for my evidence:
But I have a reason why User:45.73.93.182 reverted your edit and then you reverted it again. It's probably because he did the edit, then you reverted it. But you reverted it while he was editing it and taking a few seconds of break (possibly eating some snack or Mac n' cheese, you know). And then immediately while you reverted the edit and screaming "Hooray", he published the edit after finishing his break., which could imply that LWU is the 45 IP.
Also, see this interactions analyser, as well as this one.
Note: The CU request only applies to the connection between LWU and GWT, not the IP, which is to be solely evaluated on behavioral evidence. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:36, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Has a similar editing pattern as the previous socks, was created 11 days after the initial ban, has the Chinese flag on his userpage (GWT also stated that on his userpage), and also has a tendency to say Fixed temporal range based off x
, which is also typical of the previous socks, (see here). Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 19:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Geolocates to the Canadian province of Quebec, just like this previously blocked IP address 45.73.93.182 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 19:55, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Same primary focus on changing the "temporal range" parameter on taxoboxes of prehistoric animals as previous socks. There's significant article overlap with previous socks (See [1]). I think they are deliberately trying to avoid detection, so they're avoiding using edit summaries, which is what gave them away last time. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)