SNIyer12

SNIyer12 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
27 October 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


SNIyer12 was blocked for a pervasive pattern of disruptive editing. Now all of a sudden we have "SNIyer1234" editing on similar pages. Coincidence? I think not. Sockpuppetry for the sake of block evasion. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note SNIyer1234 appears to have been blocked indefinitely by Maxim for block evasion.—Bagumba (talk) 07:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Note that there is heavy overlap of files edited, and SNIyer1234 was created days after SNIyer12 was blocked.—Bagumba (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Master and puppet tagged, and both indef blocked. Nothing left to do.—Bagumba (talk) 08:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


16 May 2015
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Procedural report before blocking as a WP:DUCK. Shares SNIyer12's interest in sports including baseball, basketball, and hockey, as well as with articles on rivalries. SNIyer12 had a keen interest in adding trivia. A common edit to Template:Chicago Bulls(edit talk links history), adding a trivial link to Bugs Bunny piped to "Hare Jordan", makes me confident this is the same editor:

One can look at the history of Bugs Bunny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to see that SNIyer12 had a slow edit war over the inclusion of the Template:Chicago Bulls into the cartoon article. —Bagumba (talk) 01:55, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note Sock tagged and indef blocked.—Bagumba (talk) 01:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


19 May 2015
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Procedural report of IPs that have already been blocked as WP:DUCK by User:Djsasso per IP talk pages e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:72.23.80.232&oldid=663111647 . IPs are based out of Ohio. See IPs' contributions for more evidence. —Bagumba (talk) 22:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

information Administrator note Nothing to do, mark for close.—Bagumba (talk) 22:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


02 November 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Largely based on behavioral evidence. The IP had exactly one edit nine years ago until it suddenly began a series of edits largely concentrated on sports rivalries (such as [3]) that have been trimmed back before, and on baseball and hockey topics that are pointless edits. Most notably, the IP is not editing like a new editor at all, and is editing just like SNIyer12, who was indeffed for sock puppetry to avoid a previous block for these exact type of edits. oknazevad (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

information Administrator note Note that previous suspected IPs of SNIyer12 were mostly (all?) from Ohio, whereas this IP is from New Jersey. Will need more behavioral similiarites (e.g. specific style) than just the general topic of sports rivalries. For example, another candidate based purely on sports rivalry interest might be Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sportsgamaniacre, whose IPs were in Pennsylvania before.—Bagumba (talk) 02:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Also added 24.101.134.12 for consideration. It was blocked as a previous sock, but became active again immediately after the last block expired. The IP had said they would take the WP:SO, but no evidence is shown that they made a formal request, which anyways should be on their original registered account.—Bagumba (talk) 19:48, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Blocking 96.242.20.185 based on evidence by Giants2008, and 24.101.134.12 based on editing timeline with 96.242.20.185, as well as its own past history.—Bagumba (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Administrator note Just asked to be unblocked on their User:Brownsfan677 sock. I have directed them again (as I have done countless times in the past) to request unblock from their SNIyer12 account. So they are definitely active again. -DJSasso (talk) 16:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also just blocked 173.91.143.190 as him. -DJSasso (talk) 16:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

29 January 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Procedural report of this IP WP:QUACKing again. Of note is the IP's affinity to 1977–78 Washington Bullets season, which coincidentally has been frequently edited since 2014 by multiple IPs also based in Ohio, many of which have been tagged by other users as suspected of being SNIyer12. For future reference, those IPs might provide further insight into their behavioral habits.—Bagumba (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC) —Bagumba (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yeah his location and behaviour is very well known. Was just thinking the other day I am surprised I haven't noticed any lately. Guess I will have to do some combing again to see what he has been up to lately. -DJSasso (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

information Administrator note IP blocked.—Bagumba (talk) 14:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


12 December 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


While this account seemingly has a more diverse set of interests than the previous socks I stumbled upon a while back, some key behavioral traits lead me to believe this is SNIyer12.

In general, it looks like Snoopy is using different sources than SNIyer and previous socks, but some of the formatting is similar. Many of Snoopy's edits (including those linked above) have harvnb templates, and edits by SNIyer and socks do as well. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • I concur. This is a user I have followed over his "career" of socking and he has some very obvious halmarks to his editing. Good catch I was just thinking the other day that I hadn't seen him in quite awhile and wondered if he had stopped or gotten smarter. -DJSasso (talk) 14:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]