Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
Nangparbat (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
January 2009
Revision histories
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abhijeet_Bhattacharya&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surgery&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nanga_Parbat&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Baintha_Brakk&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wars_and_conflicts_between_India_and_Pakistan&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saser_Kangri&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Line_of_Control&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rimo_I&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dharavi&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azad_Kashmir&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jammu_and_Kashmir&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Northern_Areas&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gasherbrum_III&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Junagadh&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Princely_state&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Extreme_points_of_India&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=India%E2%80%93Pakistan_relations&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wakhan_Corridor&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kargil_War&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Chawinda&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Longewala&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religious_violence_in_India&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_military_disasters&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Srinagar&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sino-Indian_War&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aftermath_of_the_2008_Mumbai_attacks&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Chawinda&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religious_violence_in_India&action=history
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47&action=history
New page histories Thegreyanomaly (talk) 23:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Pages
Abhijeet Bhattacharya
Surgery
Nanga Parbat
Baintha Brakk
Wars and conflicts between India and Pakistan
Saser Kangri
Line of Control
Rimo I
Talk:Dharavi
Azad Kashmir
Jammu and Kashmir
Northern Areas
Gasherbrum III
Junagadh
Princely state
Extreme points of India
India–Pakistan relations
Wakhan Corridor
Kargil War
Battle of Chawinda
Battle of Longewala
Religious violence in India
List of military disasters
Srinagar
Sino-Indian War
Aftermath of the 2008 Mumbai attacks
Battle of Chawinda
Religious violence in India
United Nations Security Council_Resolution 47
New page histories Thegreyanomaly (talk) 23:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
This list is incomplete, but these are the pages I have been monitoring Thegreyanomaly (talk) 08:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
I am back in Berkeley on my primary computer. I have more of Nangparbats vandalizing grounds. I am too busy at the moment to go through all my records, but here is one more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pakistan-administered_Kashmir&action=history
169.229.100.189 (talk) 06:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC) ^ that was me, my cookies expired and forgot to reloggin Thegreyanomaly (talk) 06:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Also, today many of lucasbfr's semiprots expire. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 07:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I recommend lengthy semi-protection of the articles at the locus of dispute. Eventually they will tire of finding newer, obscurer articles to bother. Jehochman Talk 01:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
New sock ip, new pages: Special:Contributions/86.156.211.8 Thegreyanomaly (talk) 23:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Damn, that idiot surely is persistent. I have no problems reprotecting the affected articles, but please keep the protection length to a reasonable minimum (2-3 months) don't indef please, the aim is to drive him away not to lock all possible improvements by IPs later on. -- lucasbfr talk 08:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Clerk note: Patrolling Admins seem agreed that rangeblocks would carry excessive collateral damage. EdJohnston has semi-ed the articles affected by the attacks, so nothing further to be done at this time. Mayalld (talk) 13:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Tiptoety talk 20:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
86.158.176.40 was blocked for 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. 86.151.126.123 appears to be a reincarnation. Although 86.158.176.40 edited only talk pages, both seem to be interested in same articles and people (Wikireader41). Same IP range. —Zener 16:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note:: Working on finishing this one up now. Nathan T (formerly Avruch) 21:09, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Clerk note:: Reported IP blocked by CU Nishkid64 as Nangparbat. Nathan T (formerly Avruch) 21:14, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Nangparbat and 86.158.177.27 exhibit similar behavior patterns. Both anxiously revert edits made by "indian users" -- users from India or who edit with an Indian POV. Take this edit from Nangparbat, for instance[1] and contrast it with the very next edit made on that user talk page by 86.158.177.27[2]. 86.158.177.27 has only been editing for a very short while, but seems to simply be carrying on the same edit conflicts with the same people as Nangparbat. The IP address of 86.158.177.27 certainly fits within the range of IP addresses used by Nangparbat so far, although to be fair there are over 3,000 possible IP addresses within that range. Banaticus (talk) 02:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Please archive. —— nixeagleemail me 15:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Fits in that IP range, user is continuing the previous discussion on my talk page. Re the last report, it quacks like a duck. ;) My user page, continued discussion. Quacks, eh? ;) Banaticus (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Just registered and he knows his way around, immediately responding to my level-4 warning by replying on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. That's quite something for a newbie? Not just nationalist POV on Trans-Karakoram Tract but as well on Azad Kashmir, Northeast India and K2. Qwrk (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Administrator noteI'm not sure what you hope to achieve from SPI, since you haven't given any evidence to suggest socking, nor have you specified whose sockpuppet you believe him to be or which accounts you believe he is using abusively. It seems to me that there's nothing for SPI to do here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk note: Merged from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spokebasic. Elockid (Talk) 19:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Administrator note Quack, quack, the mystery sockpuppeteer is Nangparbat. Per customary procedure, account blocked and tagged, and articles edited except K2 semi-protected for 3 months. K2 is on pending changes so let's see how it goes for the next week or so. Elockid (Talk) 19:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Has been blocked for one week for block evasion,[4] has edit warred across multiple articles as an IP. His first contributions are to continue to stalk and revert my edits and continue his edit wars. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Nice try I knew you would try and associate me with that ip 86 I have not even edited any of his articles nor have I restored his edits please try again MarcusMaximus0 (talk) 17:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Everyone's blocked, so I'll mark for close. As a general note, logging out to continue edit warring is a bad idea. TNXMan 19:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Could a clerk merge this case to Nangparbat (talk · contribs)'s case please? Elockid (Talk) 15:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
As user MarcusMaximus0 this guys sole purpose was to revert everything I added to any article. His first edits ever were to revert me on an article which very few people have ever edited.[7] He has now appeared on an article undergoing review for GA status, and is wreaking havoc, as he said he would as MarcusMaximus0 when he said he would revert and screw up any edits I make to Wikipedia. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: - Just for reference, MarcusMaximus0 (talk · contribs) (who has been reported at SPI previously) confessed that they're a sock of Nangparbat, so that can be the point of reference for a CU, if one is needed. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 21:41, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Mar4d was blocked from wikicommons for using multiple accounts.[8] The wikipedia NerosRevenge account was created after Mar4d was blocked for edit warring on the same articles Nero then immediately turned to. Also, the name is quite telling as it speaks of revenge. Mar4d had been working on "revenge" for another user's pointing out of atrocities committed by the Pakistani military. The "revenge" now consists of pointing out abuses by India's military. Nothing wrong with that, just the way it seems to be done is wrong. JCAla (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Some Diffs:
Edit warring on Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir (Indian-administered Kashmir) [9][10]
Edit warring on Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War [11]
First act after registration of a new user? [12]
"New" user immediately edit warring and adding content on same issues? [13][14][15]
Immediately creating an article Rape in Indian-administered Kashmir meant to be a counter to Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War created by User:Darkness Shines with whom Mar4d was edit warring?[16] [17]
Immediately on Darkness Shines' talk page? [18]
Also, see this amount of edit warring on the article history.[19]
This is definitely a sock of a knowledgeable user, the most likely being Mar4d, but certainly others might be behind it as well. If more diffs are needed please tell me. JCAla (talk) 20:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
[27] Darkness Shines (talk) 21:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey guys sorry to break your party but did you know I do not live in Pakistan like mard does? just a thought NerosRevenge (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Hey Jcala I just read your post about "revenge" didnt your friend darkness create [31] in a tit for tat response to Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir do you spread your hypocrisy on your toast as well? I am sure this new awaze guy also wanted some revenge by edit warring seems allot like darkness :) NerosRevenge (talk) 21:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
User:DeltaQuad/SPI/NeedDiffs -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 20:15, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
This list seems to contain editors from all sides, however I do not believe sockmasters editing in India/Pakistan areas are capable of pretending to support the other side. Is there a serious suggestion that Nangparbat is Mar4d... Why? Why are Barrott and Awaaz e-Kashmir the same person (given that they are violently opposed to each other) and so on. It is essential that you provide diffs showing similarities between these users edits. Or nothing is going to happen. Elen of the Roads (talk) 18:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Not sure Could another checkuser please look at Awaaz e-Kashmir. I'm not sure what to make of it. Definitely not Nangparbat though. Elen of the Roads (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
JCAla, if you submit another SPI like this, clearly a mass fishing expedition without proper evidence, I will fully support the clerks if they choose to close it without further ado.
Can this be shifted over to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat, as he is the only sockmaster. Thanks. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Same MO as MarcusMaximus0 flat out edit warring and reverting me on sight Darkness Shines (talk) 17:11, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
And when will you come clean about your community ban dodging account ? Awaaze be a man and stop provoking other users if you want peace Barrot0114 (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The usual, turns up and starts reverting me on Anti-Pakistan sentiment restoring content added by his last sock Barrot0114 Darkness Shines (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Marking for close. TNXMan 16:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed, blocked, tagged. TNXMan 14:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
[41] Straight into talk pages of editors his last two socks interacted with. Calls Indian editors POV pushers which Nangparbat does on a regular basis. Says the article on human rights abuses in azad kashmir is not notable and should be deleted, his last sock edit warred on that article. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Based on technical evidence the following accounts are Likely operated by the same person:
The latter is a previously confirmed sock. Amalthea 15:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Same as the last time Darkness Shines (talk) 21:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I know Nangparbat usually edits from the 86 range but this one just looks ducky. As the sock NerosRevenge Nangparbat copied and pasted copyvios into articles, so has this IP[42] Geolocates to roughly the same area also. I am unsure if this is him but perhaps his IP range has changed. Still same ISP as Nangparbat. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Closing. There's no point in blocking the address now. Just as an FYI, BT has more ranges than just the 86 range and they don't stick to just one. Elockid (Talk) 20:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Mar4d is based in Peshawar as are these IP's. Mar4d was told to stop stalking my edits by admin Salvio giuliano[43] Once he had been told to stop stalking me the IP 39.47.46.80 appeared out of nowhere and began reverting me. Mar4d claims I have ownership and IDONTLIKEIT issues with articles I have created,[44]. IP 39.47.46.80 says exactly the same thing[45] Mar4d disagrees that adding content about Iran to Human rights violations in Balochistan is coatrack, the IP removes the coatrack tag I had added[46]. On Inter-Services Intelligence activities in Afghanistan the IP 39.47.46.80 complains about allegations of suicide bombers being in the article[47] So does Mar4d[48] Darkness Shines (talk) 09:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Also this one:
The 60.228 IP edited for two days in June 2010, and is a dynamic address belonging to an ISP. It has an unsavoury reputation with the blacklisters, but as it's not currently being used by anyone to edit Wikipedia and you have presented no evidence that it is Mar4d. 124.125 hasn't edited since January 2011 and you have presented no evidence that it is Mar4d. What are you expecting an admin to do here. I have no means of telling whether an editor used these addresses all that time ago. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Just take a look at this one example, the edits on Wakhan District. There are others but they will take a while to unravel in old revision history. These IPs could be coming back for future editing; any punishment for an offence committed should be enforced retrospectively.
Stop press! Confession: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Central_Asia&diff=409744576&oldid=409744515
I would prefer to email evidence, I feel to much gets given away with every SPI conducted. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
What the hell is wrong with you Darkness Shines? Do not edit my user page and show me evidence here. I want evidence of actions that match with anyone else? --I am Agent X (talk) 15:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Why does he edit East India company or what? How did you get to my case you got eyes on my pages? This is quacky because I only had one chat with you --I am Agent X (talk) 15:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
To be honest, I really don't think that this is Nangparbat at all. Elockid (Talk) 15:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks man! Can you close this case because no evidence? --I am Agent X (talk) 15:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
More of the same, massive POV pushing, Usual edit summary's. IP just came off an autoblock and back to his old tricks. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:42, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Closing. None of these are Nangparbat. Elockid (Talk) 03:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
The usual, edit warring, This and this are quite obvious Darkness Shines (talk) 11:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Thanks ds :) Ruffruder0 (talk) 11:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Obvious sock. Ruffruder0 (talk · contribs) blocked. Elockid (Talk) 14:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
That is not me when I said a few days I mean weeks then maybe come back lol but im not stupid enough to come back after a heart to heart my dear DS :) 86.182.171.135 (talk) 22:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Same as before. Same ISP, geolocation. The one edit so far is so obviously him it would be a waste of time explaining it. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Will e-mail evidence if required. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:36, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Looks like he has gone mobile. I can think of no editor who would post a pointless YGM on my talk[51] so as to waste my time than Nangparbat Darkness Shines (talk) 19:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This really doesn't qualify as sufficient evidence. In any case it's stale. Elockid (Talk) 17:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
This user's first edits (and only as of now) are to undo mine. Could be using a proxy server as well; so please check out for any conspicuous details. --Rvd4life (talk) 17:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Found a second one.
We really need to report this guy to BT Broadband (his ISP). He's been giving people headaches here for years. --Rvd4life (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
No doubt in my mind this is Nang[52][53] 17:25, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Administrator note Account blocked and pages protected. Elockid (Talk) 17:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
[54] Usual POV pushing. In that diff is content which is not only a copyvio but is if I recall correctly copied from the same source User:NerosRevenge used for the same content in Rape in Jammu and Kashmir Darkness Shines (talk) 22:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Closing. This isn't NP. Elockid (Talk) 22:22, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Firstly I am not Nangparbat secondly seems like you are an in contact with someone who has an interest in this article and editing either on behalf of them or your an alternative account of someone else either way this is extremely fishy since you randomly blurted out Nangparbat is me without any evidence Recorderz (talk) 21:00, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Taken from Darkness Shine's talk page. Yesterday (20 August), this I.P. made his/her first edit. The IP made 5 edits in total. All of these are related to I-P highly controversial topics, and the editing seems odd to me to be a first time editor. The editor hasn't edited since then.
Can you identify whether this is sockpuppetry, and what I should do next? I've been told about this sock Nangparbat, perhaps it's the same one, perhaps not.
Thanks.
I can email you more info if you'd like. --Activism1234 15:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Personal note - even if it's not Nang, perhaps the admins here may feel it is still a sock and take action.
Thanks. Activism1234 16:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
It's not him. If this is a returning user, I don't have an idea who this is at the moment. Please re-report if there is any further developments. Elockid (Talk) 02:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Has distinctive characteristics --RaviC (talk) 21:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by RaviC (talk • contribs) 20:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Newish account with just a few edits, logs in today to revert on an article it had never touched before in favour of Al-Badri reverts. Then proceeds to an AFD on an article created by Al-Badri to vote for a merge over delete, more than likely in the hopes of getting a no consensus. The suspect sock has not touched either article before, nor has it ever posted to Al-Badri's talk page. Also note, Breezeplushy edit summaries (yes all two of them) begin in lower case, a trait shared by Al-Badri Darkness Shines (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sorry, I may have messed up here, Breezeplushy may actually be Nangparbat edit Breezeplushy edit Darkness Shines (talk) 19:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Painfully obvious, should you not know how, ping my talk page. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Bb, the 109 IP was Nangparbat, he has used the range a few times. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I never heard of Nangparbat until today, so I'm hardly an expert on his editing. Nonetheless, I just blocked User:109.145.244.1 for two weeks as a probable puppet of Nangparbat. User:Qwyrxian had blocked the IP on May 28 for 48 hours for the same thing. The IP is not in the most common range of Nangparbat, but the range has been used before, I believe. Although I don't know if Relishi is a puppet, there is a connection between Relishi and the IP. Relishi made this edit adding a link, which was reverted here by MrT. The link was then restored here, as far as I know by a legitimate editor. MrT again reverted. The IP then re-added the link here. The IP then continued to edit war over the link and other material in the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Her edit at [55] is very similar in pattern with that of Nangparbat. Shovon (talk) 09:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
So obvious as to be painful, Nang has been edit warring via IP socks and a few account socks on the Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh article. Today this shiney "new" account manages to find his way to this relatively new article, to continue the edit war with his first edit, he also managed to find his way to RegentsPark talkpage with his third edit. I am having to bring this to SPI as the last obvious sock I had reported to AIV was rejected and I was told to use SPI, so sorry about that. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:48, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
He just admitted it here Darkness Shines (talk) 18:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Obvious duck case previous sock New sock Darkness Shines (talk) 18:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
[56] Kinda obvious Darkness Shines (talk) 20:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Administrator note I've blocked as an obvious sock of NP. However, prior to archive I request the clerk to merge the latest case (RahoolVerma) from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Capitals00 to here as that one is linked to this. —SpacemanSpiff 11:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Capitals00 along with his socks has edit warred with one specific user on a few articles, the fact that this "new account" first two edits are to revert that same user screams sock of Cap00. I am requesting CU as the previous bout of socking showed he had three other accounts. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Administrator noteBoth accounts are blocked as socks of Nangparbat (obvious by behavioral evidence). Please archive this case to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat and not to this page. —SpacemanSpiff 11:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Nang likes to call me a cunt Along with the edits to Post–World War II air-to-air combat losses claimig that Indian sources are biased, it is a nobvious duck case. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:18, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
A newbie who did the same edits as the two IPs that are from the same service provider as other IP socks of this master and the sock edits are typical removal of anti-Pakistan and addition of Pro-Pakistan content ([57], [58], [59]). Would like to have a CU check also, as the user opposing him considers these IPs as my sock. -- SMS Talk 15:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I've added some more names of IP and account. Here's the evidence:-
Added KAMari365, Nangs IP sock has been active on the talk page of Rape in Jammu and Kashmir, the sock avaunt has canvassed users to the page. Nang has also often targeted Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir, as has the sock with content removal. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk endorsed for CheckUser attention: Now we have five non-stale accounts which are linked by diffs it's probably worth a CU taking a look. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
[71] is like [72] including the characterization of non-vandalism as vandalism,[73][74] "Indian pov pusher",[75][76] OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 03:10, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accusation of vandalism,[82][83] typical edit warring on Rape in Jammu and Kashmir. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I expect an apology by OZ after this. 82.132.232.222 (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Clerk note: The IP has been blocked for one month for block evasion and vandalism. I see nothing to do here. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:19, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Same Pakistani nationalism[84][85] and personal attacks.[86] OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 09:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The IP users are obvious socks. They are acting as a tag Team, repeating the same comments and same views. Two different users with same interest can have same POV mindset but can't have so many similarities. Both Ips are accusing me Kautilya3 and Human3015 of having off wiki relationship to play the 3 revert rule. details Darkness Shines suspected, unblock request challenge, read the last comments, same comments Cosmic Emperor 11:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
@Reaper Eternal: This IP was blocked by BB23 as Bazaan sock. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/114.134.89.21.
I need to tell you that I am in WP for past few months and only two days ago I came across a page called WP:TAGTEAM where it was mentioned that " Working together to circumvent the three revert rule"
. Now how these new Ips will know that. They were accusing me , Human and kautily3 of playing 3 revert rule. At that time I didn't understand why both Ips were stating that. After visiting that Wiki page of tag team I was sure They are obvious socks of somebody. And one IP 39.47.50.14 told me to play video games in Kashmir conflict talk page. A proud sockmaster always treats new users as kids. It's their Psychology. They have seen when i opened my account.Cosmic Emperor 15:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Easily recognizable language to regulars on this SPI. He often creates vigilante socks to counter socks promoting Indian POV or harassing any Pakistani editor. Nothing good comes of the disruption that ensues. lTopGunl (talk) 21:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Two days ago, Zadon19 was blocked for an time of 36 Hour Because he was Pushing WP:POV and was involve in an WP:WAR, also along with him I was also blocked for 36 hour because i reverted his POV edits more than 3 times, this can be seen here
The next Day he came up with his sock and continued to doing the same on Indo-Pakistani War of 1947 he's been Reverted by many Users including twice by an Administrator and even getting so many warnings he continued to make WP:POV edits. 1st One 2nd One 3rd One 4th One 5th One 6th One In just less than 1hour he made about 7Reverts well more of we count on other pages. And this User has come directly next day when User:Zadon19 was block, His edits were absolutely same. see Edit History of Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, Zadon19 Continued to Remove Sourced Content, Gross WP:POV, involve in WP:WAR in various articles related to Indo-Pak and the next day from his Block. Although his sock 101.50.118.182 has been blocked by administrators for one week can be seen here
But today Zadon19 Came out as his blocked has expired and continued to make unconstructive edits and WP:POV With Two accounts, one being his another sock. Both been reverted several times including one By Cluebot NG See - this, and this one, this by his sock, this, despite been warned show many times, he continued to make unconstructive edits
Now I request administrators to completely banned him with all his accounts, and IP's because day again day he came up with his sock and start making unconstructive and WP:POV edits on various articles. MCIWS (talk) 13:27, 8 July 2015 (UTC) Someone please request check user also, I forget to request MCIWS (talk) 13:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This is so ridiculous the above user is a sock of Knightwarrior25 and a case is already going to be filled against him he has also violated the 3 revert rule he is a pure edit warrior. VijayBJ (talk) 13:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
90.201.7.178 like previous accounts, very much interested in Knighwarrior socks, and reverting other IP's edit when he himself is IP editing.
Anyone who is not supporting his POV is branded as sock. 112.79.35.227 (talk) 18:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to abecedare, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Abecedare#RfPP_ping vanjagenije can now proceed. I don't have much experience with nangparbat. The ShivParvati account is also suspicious though its inactive now. nangparbat has a habit of opening accounts with Indian names to push pro-Pakistan POV, ShivaParvati587 is the name of Hindu Gods but the account is making anti-Indian edits.--112.79.39.68 (talk) 04:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC) Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Making single purpose account just to edit war and defame "Indian" sources, the way he did months/years ago,[87] that they are "biased", not neutral,[88][89] "Indian propaganda",[90] same things that he said with his former socks.[91][92][93] Capitals00 (talk) 16:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I just closed this, please don't reopen. It's not him (didn't run a check). Marking as close with no action. ElockidHappy holidays! 16:56, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Obvious sock is obvious. The account exhibits the same kind of editing patterns and behaviors as previous socks--just look at the contribs
---
He is obviously in cahoots with banned users by his own admission. I will revert you without a second thought from here on
..I have a strong suspicion that User Signedzzz is in cahoots the with the banned sock KahnJohn who originally added this material
Kautylia)-[134] (
bharat rikshaw)
R.Shukla.Mohan is a clear sock of Nangparbat. Bbb23— can you block the sock based on WP:DUCK? —MBlaze Lightning T 11:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Can we run a Checkuser using the latest data? This account has been around for more than a year and never got flagged. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
@Kautilya3: What "latest data"? I don't see anything in the archive that is not stale. @MBlaze Lightning: The evidence presentation is very thin. More diffs and connections need to be provided.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:26, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
[142] Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me —MBlaze Lightning T 10:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
One and only edit made to[143], just like before he selected same topic with similar IP,[144] was blocked for block evasion,[145] and currently range blocked by @DoRD:, that's why using a new IP. Capitals00 (talk) 13:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The frequent use of terms like "Indian nationalist pov pusher" (pov in lower case)[146][147] suggests that that he has not given up yet.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Also take a look at Ectomorfer, it's either Nang or Fazian Darkness Shines (talk) 14:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
[158]Obvious sock is obvious. —MBlaze Lightning T 08:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
A chronic socker has tilted everything in this page towards a pro-Indian view therefore it needs a major rework
this article is a lop sided view which favours the Shia claims. Needs a major overhaul and review by neutral editors
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Added Sardeeph ([167]). It is obviously a sock, but I don't think Nangparbat. Seems to be more likely Faizan ([168]). Sro23 (talk) 16:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Same as his last socks at the Umar at Fatimah's house article Darkness Shines (talk) 14:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Back to his usual POV pushing on Pakistan related articles, Previous socks of his have hit similar article several times. [169] Geolocstion also match up Darkness Shines (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
On a serious note how will I manage a long lay off when this idiot is always accusing some random ips of being me it will constantly force me to defend myself. White priviledge is real even on Wikipedia. 82.132.187.87 (talk) 20:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. As well just editing on this investigation in the above case, he has also edited on Khalid ibn al-Walid where blocked socks such as Ectomorfer and Tagarayen4 edited. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Boby1305 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)'s first and only edit thus far is to restore content[170] originally added by a Nangparbat IP sock.[171] It's possible that this could also be a sock of Faizan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as one of his sock edited the same article not too long ago.[172]
Please also look for sleepers. @KrakatoaKatie: —MBlaze Lightning T 07:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
That don't look like any Nang sock I ever saw, his English is way better than that. He got into uni for God's sake, the education system in the UK is Shite, but not that Shite. Darkness Shines (talk) 08:07, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Still censoring same aspects of history of Mirpur like he did with his socks[173] before, and this time with an account started editing this August. Right after 1947 Mirpur massacre was protected for avoiding disruptive edit warring from the IP, he switched to his account to carry on his edit war. Same logic to make reverts, "No double standards",[174] "stop your vandlistic double standards"[175]. Same location as one of the last IP blocked as Nangparbat.[176] And still canvassing same user to help him edit war.[177][178] Capitals00 (talk) 12:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I have come across some of the socks during my editing time and when I first saw the account ShaniAli1lo it seemed familiar but I had no concrete evidence. In Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive351#User:ShaniAli1lo reported by User:Emir of Wikipedia (Result: No violation) they do demonstrated knowledge of interactions bans, which I don't think would be known to new editors. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Also see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Sockpuppetry, edit warring by a banned user, using racist language. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Seems to have an overlap with articles with Sock-Puppeteer and the socks. Edits articles with a Pro-Pakistani bias. Adamgerber80 (talk) 09:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
--Bbb23 (talk) 19:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
UK based IP with pro Pakistani tilt. Meets the modus of the LTA. Adamgerber80 (talk) 09:32, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar IP address blocked a day ago. Back with pro Pakistan POV edits on same subset of pages. Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Looks like a throwaway account created just to revert me on Muhammad Mahmood Alam.[181] Same usage of terms like "pure pov pushing" (lower case)[182][183][184], and the same inability to capitalize the second word of my username.[185][186][187] —MBL Talk 13:48, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Recently created account reverting edits of a previous sockpuppet ShaniAli1lo. Making the same argument about Jammu page as other IPs reported earlier. Adamgerber80 (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
[190][191][192][193] – WP:DUCK —MBL Talk 02:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Editing the page as an earlier sock ShaniAli1lo. Same POV as before. IP also matches to know IP subnet used by the LTA Adamgerber80 (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
IP evading block. Same arguments as before on other pages where the editor likes to insert allegedly or claimed to make it more "neutral" Adamgerber80 (talk) 16:12, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Tried to remove the mention of 1947 Mirpur Massacre from the Mirpur page. This is the same edit that Nangparbat is obsessed about has done multiple times in the past. Requesting a CU and can you please check for sleepers? Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@Adamgerber80: If he's done it "multiple times", please provide diffs.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Again removes the mention of Mirpur Massacre based on the same reason that is not needed per Jammu article. Same as other users provided before. Adamgerber80 (talk) 13:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
IP now blocked. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Same as ever, 24 hr block on the IP will do as he jumps constantly Darkness Shines (talk) 20:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same as before,he's on his mobile so 24 hr block on the IP please Darkness Shines (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Canvassing NadirAli[207], Mar4d,[208] like previous socks.[209][210][211] Also casting aspersions by pointing out nationalities, and calling "Indian" sources to be unreliable[212] like previous socks.[213] False accusation of vandalism,[214] like previous sock.[215] Capitals00 (talk) 04:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed + Rayanakho (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Blocked and tagged. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Using the same WP:SPS sources to make edits on the same page Tarek Fatah. Diffs here [216],[217] Adamgerber80 (talk) 23:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Unrelated. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
IP editing the same thing as the previous socks. Here is one diff [218], Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Has made edits to this page in the past from his socks Rayanakho. Same pattern of personal attacks invoking nationalities. Looks like a WP:DUCK Adamgerber80 (talk) 22:40, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
As usual same IP, removing content about India.[219] And edit warring Capitals00 (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Depicts the same POV as the LTA editor. Has edited on Dawood Ibrahim with the same edit as a block evading IP ([220],[221]). Is also obsessed with other similar themes here ([222],[223]). Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
what kind of joke is this? i have no connection to those IPs whatsoever. i will be found innocent against your nationalist driven pursuit to get me sanctioned. both of you are targetting me because i don't agree with your POV edits.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
how am i supposed to defend myself against nationalist driven allegations when i am not even aware of the user i am accused of being a sock of. do wikipedia admins not have the ability to check my IP or check if i've used a proxy (which i have never)? somehow you believe that similar edits mean i am a sock of another user even though these edits are nearly a year apart. i am being targetted because of my disputes with these editors with regard to the above articles and more but i am engaging in discussions with these users on the articles.
i would appreciate being treated justly and being able to defend myself instead of biased discussion going on behind my back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gangadesh721 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Possible. The technical data is fairly old. Behavioural evidence needs evaluation.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:53, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Registers a new account and joins[231] the article where Mar4d was edit warring,[232] just like before.[233][234] Online around same time as him and generally rejects any "Indian",[235] like past socks.[236] My Lord (talk) 10:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
No other purpose except harassing Mountain157 per his modus operandi.[237][238][239][240] Shashank5988 (talk) 19:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. The articles I edit extend far beyond articles Mountain157 edits as well. In all cases where Mountain157 and I have had disputes, we have either stopped the dispute or discussed it as is the case here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mountain157#Article_on_Balochistan_Liberation_Army PLEASE NOTE: In the above link, it shows my IP address as I forgot to log in when making my edits. From this point forward, I will not be editing outside of my account.
The user who created this SPI request has also suspiciously recently deleted my edits (without reason) to certain articles that both I and Mountain157 were editing:
To add to suspicion, this user is accusing me of being the sockpuppet of a user (Abhishek9779) that Mountain157 was severely reprimanded for accusing several users of being a sockpuppet of here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Topic_ban_on_Mountain157_from_reporting_any_alleged_sockpuppet_anywhere
Perhaps an SPI should be requested of this user, as they seem to be an SPI of Mountain157 --Hummer431 (talk) 20:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Hummer431 is Unrelated to Abhishek9779. However, Hummer431 is Confirmed to Gangadesh721 (talk · contribs · count), an account that was found to be a suspected sock of Nangparbat (talk · contribs · count). Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Created just after the last sock was blocked here. Jumps straight to the talk page just for attacking other editors as "Indian",[241][242] calls their edits a "vandalism",[243][244] and then wikihounds their edits by reverting them as "vandalism".[245][246]
In any case this is an obvious sock.
This case is pretty old now and may seem stale to those who are unfamiliar. Out of the CUs who checked this SPI before only Callanecc seems active and may still recall details or find logs. Orientls (talk) 07:15, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Kthxbay and Wolfagain1:
After seeing this edit I am finding it better to say that these both accounts are at least same person. Both accounts were created on 21 June 2019 - 22 June 2019.
Though Lourdes has blocked Wolfagain1 for a week, there is more left for doing. Orientls (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same tactics of disparaging opposing editor as "nationalist indisn",[251], like before.[252]
PremiAnans and one of the IP are tag team edit warring at Instrument of Accession (Kalat).[253][254]
More tag team edit warring at: Insurgency_in_Balochistan.[255][256]
ArunJain190's edits to Mirpuri diaspora,[257][258][ also reminds of Nangparbat's earlier sock edits about the same subject at 1947 Mirpur massacre.[259][260] Orientls (talk) 20:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
TruthUnknown1 is another new account, who is too talking about a "Political scientist Rafi Sheikh" just like 82.132.214.45,[261][262] and recruiting the same editors as what Nangparbat used to do.[263][264] Orientls (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Wiki1reader23 is another new account that can be seen tag teaming to remove the same content as Himachal78.[265][266], [267][268] Orientls (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Himachal78 has edited the same articles, reversing to the same version as the IP while falsifying their edit summary despite a citation being present.[269][270] Wiki31295 (talk) 21:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)