MusicLover650

MusicLover650 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

22 December 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Just before User:MusicLover650 was indeffed they were working on the Leather Project and Blake Morgan jobs. Some of Earflaps very first edits were the recreation of the The Sledge/Leather Project page. It was word for work the same as the deleted version by MusicLover650. They also upload pictures of Blake Morgan.[1] Uploading a picture of Blake Morgan was the second last edit of Music before being blocked.[2]

They have the exact same referencing style as described here. User:Robohearteipr also has the exact same referencing style.[3] ANd was also involved in uploading pictures of Blake Morgan.[4]

Looking at all these accounts first edits. None are new editors of Wikipedia. Rather than are all an experienced editor. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

CesareAngelotti is obviously a paid editor and given their immediate interest in AFDs they are a sock of someone. This !vote back in 2014 was to support a sock of an editor linked to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sibtain_007/Archive although no CU evidence was found. SmartSE (talk) 10:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While CesareAngelotti is pretty obviously a paid editor (at least for quite a few of his creations and expansions), I don't think he is part of this group. For one thing, his referencing style is different, e.g. CesareAngelotti vs. MusicLover650. Note also that a few overlaps with articles by the sockmaster or known socks may simply indicate that different "jobs" for the same article have been listed on sites like Fiverr, Upwork, etc. For example, three different editors (one, two, three) had been paid via Fiverr to edit Frederick Achom at various times . And while one of them was found to be a sock from a very large farm, none of the three were socks of each other. Voceditenore (talk) 10:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

17 January 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


User Emitdfatt appeared a few days ago claiming to be the subject of the article Emit (artist), which was deleted as WP:CSD#G5 in December. This isn't an obvious WP:DUCK, but because we often get new sockpuppets showing up trying to get their previous work undeleted, it's appropriate to have it checked here, particularly if it is a sock trying to impersonate the subject. Then again, it could be legit. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

User:Earflaps account has been active in the last three months. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:16, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

10 February 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Recreation of Rick Boardman. The user was registered on 19 January 2017 and made only 2 edits so far but I notice the user has the habit of adding long edit summary same as the master and previous sock e.g. this. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller and Ajraddatz: This newly registered user Jenna828 recreated Andy Masi earlier created by the master and again the habit of adding long edit summary is very similar so do I need to open a new case for the CU? It looks like they are now using new account each time they recreate deleted articles. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 09:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note that they have disclosed their COI and claim to be a new user: Talk:Andy_Masi. Given the content of the page, it seems unlikely that they have created that themself and they may be proxying for the master. SmartSE (talk) 10:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I saw that but to be honest they don't look new users per their editing pattern. Jenna828 was registered today and he is well aware of WP:CITE, WP:NAMESORT, disclosure policies etc. and if I look at this it looks like created by an experienced user. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep that's exactly what I meant. Those aren't the edits of a newbie. SmartSE (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Red X Unrelated Which doesn't mean impossible, but a block could only be made on a behavioral basis. Doug Weller talk 13:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


12 March 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Recreation of Shama Joseph under different title Sak Pase. The article was earlier created by a sock in this group. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:06, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

18 April 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Hkronk claimed here to "have been in the process of working on Kobi Arad's page" — but the only people who have been "working" on it lately are Earflaps sockpuppets and User:Operacontralto, which makes me wonder if this user is related somehow. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Red X Unrelated.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


24 April 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


A bunch of accounts who's edits strongly connects them to sockfarms and undeclared paid editing. (Phekoo, Kobi Arad, Surya Jayaweera). Most closely matching to Bobby159753 who is a blocked sock of MusicLover650/Earflaps.

Phekoo

Background on Phekoo [7]. BrettKrent (PlikoraT sock) created a mainspace article here [8]. From that draft HaiderPoert (PlikoraT sock) created a mainspace article here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phekoo&oldid=739431688]. It was patroled by Doosedouyrs (PlikoraT sock) [9]. Bobby159753 (MusicLover650/Earflaps sock) has also maintained a sanbox for [10] Phekoo and for his band [11] Red Diamond Dogs (G5 deleted)
Knoxvi11e's sole edits are to Phekoo [12]. Timeline, article is moved from main to draft [13], 6 April Bobby159753 puts it in sandbox [14] and develops it [15]. 6 April Knoxvi11e then posts that developed version into mainspace from Bobby159753's sandbox [16].
Кость Лінивець removed the COI tag [17].
Кость Лінивець Edited the sandbox of Bobby159753 (MusicLover650/Earflaps sock) [18], then a draft for Phekoo.

Kobi Arad

Kobi Arad Band is created, probably by Bobby159753 (MusicLover650/Earflaps sock). It was deleted on 7 April.
Кость Лінивець early edit concerns Kobi Arad [19]. An edit much like Earflaps [20] and Bobby159753 [21]
Кость Лінивець On 5 March xe states here "I'm trying to create a page about him, .."
Hkronk, On 18 April xe states [22] "I have been in the process of working on Kobi Arad's page."
Кость Лінивець Edited the sandbox of Bobby159753 (MusicLover650/Earflaps sock) [23], then a draft for Kobi Arad Band.
Slewkow [24] Created a version of Kobi Arad [25] and is now blocked as a sock of MusicLover650/Earflaps

Surya Jayaweera

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Surya_Jayaweera&action=history
Olderdawnsd's contributions [26] are the norm for a throughaway promo sock. User, Talk and Sandbox immediately. Develop the sandbox the post a promotional article into Mainspace. Do nothing else and dissapear. Article's other main editor is Bobby159753 (Earflaps sock). Surya Jayaweera is part of WolfeTech and GXB Interactive, both created by Bobby159753
Кость Лінивець Was working on a draft of WolfeTech [27]. WolfeTech was created by Bobby159753 (Earflaps sock). (Also GXB Interactive [28]. GXB Interactive was also created by Bobby159753

Additional

User:Кость Лінивець also editted Glen Carroll and Sticky Fingers (tribute band). Both are sock/spam magnets. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:43, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


30 April 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Almost every new editor that has significantly edited Draft:Kobi Arad or Kobi Arad is a sockpuppet or paid editor. For example, the first article Hkronk edited was DJ Disciple. They moved on to Draft:Kobi Arad. Most of the editors are in some way connected to User:Earflaps or User:MusicLover650. The web is very complicated. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:29, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I've been accused of being a sockpuppet, I'm not. I have edited other pages before. What can I do to prove that I am an independent user acting of my own volition? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hkronk (talkcontribs) 21:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

I removed two very old named accounts. Hronk has already been dealt with before. The IP's edits are way too old. This report is a waste of time. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


04 June 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Checkuser requested to root out sleeper accounts. Binksternet (talk) 06:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The editor interaction tool shows lots of common articles. Binksternet (talk) 07:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed to Ctmv2 (talk · contribs · count) and other previous socks. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


07 June 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Benarnold98 displays the same recent interest in "associated acts" as other recent socks, adding list entries without regard to the guideline restricting such entries to very extensive collaborations. The instructions were reverted, showing that the person is perfectly aware of the issue, yet the disruption continues. Benarnold98 has put the word "decluttered" in edit summaries,[44][45][46] in the same manner as confirmed socks Wessantana[47] and Univalve.[48] No need for checkuser as behavior is the exact same as previous socks. Binksternet (talk) 23:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

07 July 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Both Juniormatsinabe and DIT39 have been edit warring over the "associated acts" parameter in the infobox of musical artist biographies. Both accounts were registered in late June after the last two socks were blocked on June 15. Both are putting URLs into their edit summaries,[54][55] leading me to believe they are the same person. They are similar to earlier confirmed socks by the same edit summary usage of "qualify" – "I removed the ones that didn't qualify" vs. "Mariah doesn't qualify" vs. "Jhené Aiko and YG don't qualify for associated acts".
I am requesting checkuser to flush out any sleepers. Binksternet (talk) 22:06, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Hunnidpacant whose first edit was to add associated acts, and whose second edit was to revert me to restore the associated acts that had been put in place earlier by blocked socks Juvenile3001, Juniormatsinabe and DIT39.[56]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed to previous socks. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


03 August 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

MusicLover650 appears to edit from the US state of Florida, as demonstrated by a couple of IP addresses doing the same things. Many recently created socks have been reacting angrily, especially Eurofan86 reverting seven times at Meek Mill, and Adamleggings blanking my userpage. More evidence to follow. Binksternet (talk) 16:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • @Binksternet: Early edits like this are pretty suspicious IMO. Where on earth did they get the date of birth of an obscure polish musician from? An image by the same filename (could be a different photo) was uploaded to commons by another user which is another redflag for me. Here's a more recent example of another unsourced DOB in an article that was previously deleted at AFD. This, the fact that their edits are almost exclusively music-related seems to merit a check. SmartSE (talk) 21:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Checkuser Comments - since there is no accurate data for the original account in this chain, I will simply link the identified socks. The following are  Confirmed to each other, and to recently blocked socks in the same SPI:

Several of these accounts are already blocked, but not all of them. no No comment regarding IPs.Risker (talk) 03:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, the following are Red X Unrelated:

Risker (talk) 03:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


06 September 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This account has already been blocked as a sock, but based on the volume of accounts in the above case, I'm guessing you may wish to run a sleeper check. Home Lander (talk) 19:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 January 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Endrias Kassa is very interested in the infobox parameter "associated acts", in the same manner as previous socks and IPs from Orlando, Florida, and on the same articles. The first edit by Endrias Kassa was this one on the Kendrick Lamar biography, where Orlando IP 172.58.174.243 had also changed the associated acts.[93] At the Mike Will Made It biography, Endrias Kassa and confirmed sock Wessantana both changed the associated acts listings, while providing edit summaries with a similar style.[94][95] Confirmed sock Maracambe put associated acts in alphabetical order, stating so in the edit summary,[96] and likewise Endrias Kassa.[97][98] Checkuser requested to verify the connection. Binksternet (talk) 18:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Red X Unrelated.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:03, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


18 March 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Chicksfromvenus is another username that is focused primarily on promoting rappers by adding associated acts to rapper biographies. Registered two days after Orlando, Florida, IP 104.136.65.134 was blocked, the user has made many of the same edits as confirmed MusicLover650 socks, for instance changing the infobox from musical artist to person at the Wiz Khalifa biography, while adding associated acts.[99][100] Chicksfromvenus restored the edits of IP 104.136.65.134 at the article about Cash Money Records.[101][102] Binksternet (talk) 06:19, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

11 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


To paraphrase the last SPI, Benarnold99 is another username that is focused primarily on promoting rappers by adding associated acts to rapper biographies. Registered soon after the last sock Chicksfromvenus was blocked, the user has edit some of the same articles as confirmed MusicLover650 socks, for instance expanding [103] Blac Youngsta which was started by the last sock Chicksfromvenus [104]. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

15 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same MO as the PM, superfluous additions to Associated Acts on Chris Brown and Ty$ for instance.

User Benarnold99 added names to AA list on Nas and was subsequently confirmed as a sock, blocked, and this user added them after the fact. JesseRafe (talk) 15:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Red X Unrelated. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:10, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


30 December 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Checkuser not needed, as behavior is obvious. MusicLover650 was very much concerned about the "associated acts" parameter in the infobox, leaving edit summaries arguing about how this and that artist should qualify. The IP6 range has been doing the same thing, with one of them blocked recently for disruption,[105] and another coming to my talk page to deliver a personal attack.[106] Here are the revealing edit summaries left by RedNinja567,[107][108] and the ones left by previous socks.[109][110][111] Binksternet (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dang, I have to reconsider my assessment about the IP range because of one edit summary, "view source",[112] which is only used by the dog and rapper vandal. Binksternet (talk) 01:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Changing CU status, to check out this connection. Binksternet (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 March 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

IP has made four edits, two being blatant vandalism, two being to inquire about the dog and rapper vandal who is apparently MusicLover650. Someone editing from DRV's range posted on my talk page on Meta Wiki not to long ago regarding the DRV, probably DRV himself, sounds to me like this IP follows DRV's MO. Even if not, this could be a case of WP:NOTHERE. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 15:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC) PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 15:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

24 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

See below. Bbb23 (talk) 01:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 July 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Similar behaviour as described on LTA page: [113] MrClog (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

24 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Vandalizing rapper articles with associated acts. Found by Binksternet. Jip Orlando (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Another "music programmer" editor, just like all of MusicLover650's accounts. Makes a minimal change in one edit on electronic music producer articles by adding "music programmer" to the lead and changing the infobox occupations (such as by expanding "DJ" to "Disc jockey"), making the associated acts list vertical, changing the genres or replacing the stage name with the surname in the image caption. Similarly to the other accounts, most other edits are on rappers.

Electronic producer diffs from Jandon l:

Electronic producer diffs from other MusicLover650 accounts:

Rapper diffs from Jandon l:

Rapper diffs from other MusicLover650 accounts:

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


29 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Thiyois and all his socks were already investigated and banned, but they were wrongly assigned as being a single case. They are all sockpuppets of MusicLover650, and they need to be reorganised. Same "music programmer" additions to electronic music producer articles, same associated acts edits, same edits to primarily rapper articles.

Electronic producer diffs from Thiyojs accounts:

Electronic producer diffs from MusicLover650 accounts:

Rapper diffs from Thiyojs accounts:

Rapper diffs from MusicLover650 accounts:

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Check declined by a checkuser because the account is stale.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 19:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


20 December 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

All of these accounts were fiddling with "associated acts" in the infobox of rapper biographies.

This vandal sometimes makes an edit summary with just the name of the new addition."screwball" was added byIDontBelieveInTime, "jetsonmade" was added by ChristianCanada.

Special:Contributions/StevenIs8000 built up their edit history in the exact same pattern as blocked socks Special:Contributions/2 Kings and Special:Contributions/Orversace, first making some article edits, then messing with user pages to increase the edit count in preparation for gaining access to protected articles.

Checkuser requested to find sleepers. Binksternet (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 December 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Similar behaviour to dog and rapper vandal's past behaviour, including expanding the AAs of rappers to unreasonable levels. See [114] and [115]. There's also crosswiki evidence such as [116] which is the user reverting my reversion of DRV's additions CiphriusKane (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

21 July 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

 Looks like a duck to me - Bloombergh was created right after a user left a message on ChristianCanada's talk page because their edits on discography pages were against the MOS --FMSky --(talk) 10:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both accounts are also very very likely socks of user Pompous Retail / Terry g. bishop, but checkuser won't work for that anymore--FMSky (talk) 10:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

23 November 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

WP:DUCK to Yesterday89: Special:Diff/1122368274 vs. Special:Diff/1123194267, Special:Diff/1122398879 vs. Special:Diff/1123157813. Muhandes (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

04 December 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

WP:DUCK, redoing the same page the other socks wrote. Muhandes (talk) 14:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

17 March 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

MusicLover650 and socks were known for emphasizing rappers as being connected in groups as collaborators, adding lots of unsupported names to the "associated acts" parameter.[117] In a similar manner, sockpuppet ChristianCanada pushed the idea that groups of rappers were connected as "spinoffs" of influential leaders. ChristianCanada suggested at Template talk:Infobox musical artist that a new parameter should be added to the infobox to accommodate his idea. See Template talk:Infobox musical artist/Archive 16#“Spinoff_of” parameter being for solo artists as well. Nearly a year later, StreetKnockerzEnt made almost the same request, asking that a new parameter should be added to allow for rappers to be grouped as "Protégé"[s] of influential leaders.

ChristianCanada was blocked on July 21, 2022. StreetKnockerzEnt registered the username in December 2022. Both of them have the same diurnal pattern, taking a break from 05:00 to 11:00 UTC.[118][119] The editing intersection of both accounts is extremely wide.[120] They both changed the "origin" parameter for Tupac,[121] Both accounts were adept at adding "child" templates to infoboxes.[122][123]

Checkuser requested to make certain, and to check for sleepers. Binksternet (talk) 06:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]