Marvingroves

Marvingroves (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Report date December 22 2009, 20:27 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]


Evidence submitted by NuclearWarfare
[edit]

Hi there NUKE, VASCO here (with probably the last intervention of 2009!),

One user, Picolotto, has asked me again this favour - there is a vandal who has been specializing in the following: in players related with FC Barcelona (not always but most of the time), he has been inflating stats in box and creating some false situations (for instance, saying players have played for their countries - or unofficial autonomic regions - when they have not! - example here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jos%C3%A9_Manuel_Pinto&diff=317948577&oldid=317573451).

As far as we know, his original account was Marvingroves ("contributions" here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Marvingroves), it was warned by me and it stopped. His brilliant idea? Creating account after accout (with the subsequent warnings by several users) and continuing doing the same (in succession, he opened Racheedmani (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Racheedmani), Wikusvandermerwe (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wikusvandermerwe) and Malcolmwaller (here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Malcolmwaller)

Can anything be done in your opinion? Thank you very much in advance,

VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Copied from my talk page. NW (Talk) 20:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties   
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
[edit]
CheckUser requests
[edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: F (Other reason )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by NW (Talk) 20:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
Conclusions
[edit]
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.



Report date February 21 2010, 21:53 (UTC)
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets
[edit]


Evidence submitted by NuclearWarfare
[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NuclearWarfare&oldid=345513359#Another_SOCK_bites_the_dust.3F NW (Talk) 21:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties
[edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
[edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
[edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by NW (Talk) 21:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Confirmed Straight match. Please check the user's edits accordingly for vandalism. - Mailer Diablo 16:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: Assuming this is completed. Mailer Diablo, don't forget next time to change "endorse" in the ((RFCU)) to "checked" when you've completed the check so we know that the case can start to be wrapped up. Hopefully, running CU was fun :) –MuZemike 18:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.