HorseSnack (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• ÉnVagyokTojas (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Sock's two edits are to create a user page identical in layout to the master's, and to vote in an AfD to keep the master's article. Quack! Bazj (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Diff for sock vote in AFD [1] NeemNarduni2 (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Diff for puppeteer vote in AFD [2] Note strong consensus for deletion as hoax. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 18:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Please, compare the two. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Sock indeffed and the master blocked for 10 days. Closing the case. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• No, Vanjagenije, this is an indef and it isn't even close. This is the exact picture of someone we do not want back in ten days (it is basically a vandalism-only account before the socking!) Courcelles (talk) 19:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]