HHV was blocked July 30 @ 10:53.[1] ILM was created July 30 @ 7:42, while HHV was building up to a block for edit warring, then edited until 8:31.[2] HHV returned to editing 2 minutes after ILM's last edit.[3] ILM next edits on August 3, stopping at 8:33.[4] HHV returns 11 minutes later.[5]
Both are heavily involved in the Drake/Meek Mill publicity series. (ILM is a WP:SPA.) Both have remarkably similar opinions on the "issue".[6][7] SummerPhDv2.0 13:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
This user also seems to edit the same article pages, and use strikingly similar commentary on edits and agree on same edit arguments as HHV and user Ilovemexico99. Specifically, the Drake/Meek Mill publicity series, as well as previously arguements.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Requesting a CU because this user has used multiple accounts simultaneously in the past. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 05:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
WP:DUCK - Editing on same pages. Reverting WP:BANREVERTs of previous socks ([17]). Requesting on CU as user shows that they create many accounts at once.
Actual diffs upon request, but I think behavior is clear. Just ping me. EvergreenFir (talk) Please ((re)) 22:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
(Noting substantial similarities to CherLloydfan4life, aprior sock of HipHopVisionary.)
This account was created after the block of
CherLloydfan4life.
Both show considerable interest in Romani people, Rick Ross and Cher Lloyd.
Loud quacking: Both have made extensive off-topic additions of material about demons to Cher Lloyd.[18][19]
Requesting CU based on HipHopVisionary extensive history and the gap between this account's creation and the blocking of the last known sock. SummerPhDv2.0 17:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Noticed odd similarities among these accounts: POV pushing on African Americans, and a very specific interest in Drake (musician). टीम निकी मिनाज adds a negative statistic ([20]) in August, and in September Team Nicki Minaj II makes this edit, and this month, American Wikipedian has these statistics to add. Everyone shares a particular interest in Drake (musician), and they always use bare urls when citing web sources ([21] [22] [23]). Suspected sock American Wikipedian also removed the same information the master removed: [24] [25]). Sro23 (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The same POV pushing on African Americans, and a kind of odd fixation on Drake (musician). I believe this is the latest HipHopVisionary sock. Compare Illuminati89's drive-by tagging to Team Nicki Minaj II. Illuminati89 also continues the tradition of updating Drake (musician), always using bare urls when citing web sources: [26] [27] [28]. It's this unique combination of African Americans + Drake that makes me think this is HipHopVisionary; they always come back to the same pages. Sro23 (talk) 18:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same POV pushing on African Americans using (mostly) bare urls when citing web: [29], restoring sock edits: [30] [31], plus the recognizable Drake obsession: [32] [33] [34]. Created a day after the last sock was blocked. WP:DUCK. Sro23 (talk) 00:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Here's an account several years older than the master, but didn't become active again until recently. Given the timing of their edits, moving Jhené Aiko a few days before another HipHopVisionary moved the same article, an apparent preference for using bare urls when citing web sources: [35], restoring sock edits on Drake (musician): [36] [37], linking Toronto which is such a HipHopVisionary thing to do, I can't help but be suspicious. Sro23 (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Vandalism to a person in the hip hop industry's article. Compare username to past socks User:CanadaToronto1986, User:CanadianToronto1986. Sro23 (talk) 02:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Intersection on Kim Kardashian: [38] [39], similar drive-by tagging tactics [40] as before [41]. Sro23 (talk) 02:22, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
There's the username (compare to User:CanadaToronto1986, User:CanadianToronto1986), the overlap with multiple socks ([42] [43] [44][45] [46] [47]), and of course the Drake (musician) obsession. [48] [49] Sro23 (talk) 05:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Drive-by tagging on African Americans, Drake (musician) & related pages in a similar fashion to blocked puppets [50] [51] - note almost identical edits here: [52] [53] [54] [55]. CU requested to find possible additional accounts. Sro23 (talk) 00:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This account tag-bombs articles in a similar manner to previous sockpuppets ([56] [57]) and there's a similar focus on celebrity ethnicity as well ([58] [59]) Sro23 (talk) 08:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I noticed this suspiciously named account in a filter log, and a check turned up several more accounts and a link to this master. —DoRD (talk) 17:20, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar username ("X1986/1987", see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of HipHopVisionary), drive-by tagging ([60] [61]), and insistence on disrupting the African Americans article just as previous socks ([62] [63] [64]). Requesting CU because nearly every time additional accounts are discovered. Sro23 (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
DUCK. Name follows pattern of fandom or praise for music artists. Edits are on race-related pages, just like past socks. See, for example, edits by recent sock Post Malone fan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). EvergreenFir (talk) 16:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
These accounts are Confirmed to the master via the checkuser log:
Blocked and tagged.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Editing in the same area and recreated Matt Ox under Matt OX. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:35, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
@GSS: From now on, when you request a CU, you must explain why. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
All accounts were created within a very close time period (with Cyn Santana, Swae Lee lover, and Playboi Carti Atlanta all being created within one hour of one another). All editors made similar changes to the List of African-American neighborhoods article and within the same relative time period. I'm requesting a checkuser to pull the IP information from these accounts in order to determine if this is a string of accounts connected to LTA users or other accounts that are causing abuse, to see if there are any sleeper accounts or not, as well as to also find out whether or not there's more to this than what I found. The log timeline and the similar edits are more than enough behavioral evidence for me to establish that these accounts are operated by the same person, but I'm still in between deciding whether or not to proceed to block them for sock puppetry or to assume good faith and wait until unambiguous disruption occurs from one of these users... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
CU confirmed, similar usernames, deeply racist edits. Yunshui 雲水 07:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
All the listed accounts are Confirmed,
Blocked and tagged, listing here for the record. Yunshui 雲水 07:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
See below. Bbb23 (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Same kind of edits (repeatedly adding cn template to apparently random articles) and blatantly similar username. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The following accounts are Confirmed to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HipHopVisionary:
All accounts should either be Blocked without tags or globally locked.
Clerk assistance requested: Please move this case to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HipHopVisionary. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Article editing patterns and name matching other Gypsy series articles. This uncaught sock was found editing Mexico topics articles on Dec. 1. Raymie (t • c) 04:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Obvious sock. Similar username, editing hip hop and race-related articles like other socks of this user. Same behaviour as previously reported sock Gypsy Cher Lloyd: repeated addition of citation needed tags. [65] [66] [67] Requesting Checkuser due to history of sleeper accounts. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 03:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Quite obvious editing pattern Muhandes (talk) 08:44, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Obvious editing patterns, continues editing on Wicked Lips for instance. Requesting CU since pattern includes many multiple account creation. Muhandes (talk) 14:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar username, editing hip hop and race-related articles like other socks. Repeated addition of citation needed tags ~riley (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Creations of copyright-infringing "African Americans in [state]" articles (see User talk:Just a Wikipedian 2021 for G12 notices) and interest in the Playboi Carti article [69]. Compare with Playboi Carti fan, who had similar copyright warnings, including copying the same source for the Arkansas article. DanCherek (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
No need to run CU or anything--this is purely pro forma, for a paper trail. Pinging Binksternet, and Graham87 (who blocked the IPv6 range). Drmies (talk) 13:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Similar editing patterns and interests, including the creation of a number of redirects that were previously deleted (Romani people in x). There was also this ANI thread from February, 2022, for the suggested puppeteer. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Not trying to hide in anyway. Editor Interaction Analyser
This includes the addition of copyright conten again here from here
Restored ([71]) edits by now-blocked sock as their very first edit. Requesting CU to confirm and check for more adorbs EvergreenFir (talk) 04:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Lots quacking in Special:Contributions/2600:6C50:7EF0:4A70:0:0:0:0/64 as well EvergreenFir (talk) 04:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)