Euclidthalis

Euclidthalis (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

21 September 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


The two accounts have similar/identical English phrases in edit summaries as below:

The two accounts have common edits on many Cyprus business articles:

etc.

Bremain007's first edit [17] June 2016 follows E's block April 2016 by ~60 days

Bremain007's 13 userboxes exactly match E's in content and order (with some deleted, i.e. B's userboxes are a subset), and userpage even includes a commented-out userbox and comment in the same order. It has clearly been created by cut and paste from Euclidthalis' userpage.

I suspect there are other Cyprus editors involved in this but am out of time to file this case at the moment. Please note the static IP talkpages that I have tagged in the last 48 hours in particular 62.12.xx.xx, 93.109.xx.xx (hostname xxxx.netrun.cytanet.com.cy) and 212.50.xx.xx (hostname bcable.lim.cablenet-as.net). - Brianhe (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Pink clock Awaiting administrative action: please block Bremain007. The new user has 57 edits, 25 of them on 13 pages which Euclidthalis also edited, across diverse subjects. In addition to the identical and unusual edit summary style, this is too many coincidences. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Blocked and tagged per Ivanvector. I agree the behavioural evidence is strong enough especially with the edit summary style to link the two accounts under WP:DUCK. Marking as closed. Mkdwtalk 20:09, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


23 September 2016

Suspected sockpuppets

Adding another apparently connected account. WP:DUCK common editing in articles related to Cyprus financial entities, businesses, tourism, and Limassol, Cyprus in particular. Their editing style is a bit different and Cyprianio is prone to editing logged out, whereas the master is not, so I wouldn't be surprised if these turned out to be meatpuppets.

Common edited articles where 'C'=Cyprianio, 'B'=Bremain007 (sock), 'E'=Euclidthalis (master):

IKOS Asset Management is especially noteworthy as it is a Limassol-based company, was an article created by Euclidthalis on 13 June 2012 [38] as one of his first edits, and contains C's first edit on Wikipedia [39] on 13 September 2013. It also happens to contain a bunch of Limassol IP edits in close proximity to Cyprianio's like this.

Cyprianio's obvious logged-out edits include a number of Limassol IPs too numerous to list all of them here but here is a sample:

One more diff that may help establish a link. Special:Contributions/212.50.116.140 shows a single edit immediately following one by Euclidthalis at Cypriot wine. It's clear from the links I provided above that 212.50.*.* is commonly used by Cyprianio.

Regardless of the connection to Euclid, I would like de-prodding like this by Cyprianio IP socks to be considered as blockable in itself. Compare timing and absent edit summary to this de-prodding by C.

End of filing. Brianhe (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


29 May 2017

Suspected sockpuppets


One of the master's socks, Cyprianio was last active last month, requesting an unblock (subsequently declined) and yet a month later a new account, Sofiapapad123, comes and starts an article Cyprianio started not once but twice, Sani Resort. Too suspicious of a simple coincidence especially considering a new account starting immediately and the master was a paid article user. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 Stale. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]