Brokeradar222 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Dietpeach (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Kingofmycastle1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

All are making similar edits to the Ian Erix article. I think there is a conflict of interest (either via the subject or management), and the goal is to fluff up the article. I believe the history smells bad enough already, but I hope that CheckUser can, by proving me wrong, restore my faith in humanity. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Erix. Drmies (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk endorsed - My guess is that they're meatpuppets, but CU can confirm that for us. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed, Tiptoety ^talk 20:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Administrator note Both socks blocked and tagged; master blocked 24h for socking. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]