Bcliot33 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Mdaviskinodblue (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Menihn (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pro-forma, for the record -- already blocked and tagged by User:Drmies, per this JBL (talk) 01:46, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Per the note by Drmies pro forma can be filed. I'm in support of such a pro forma report, and so will close this for archiving. To be transparent I'll tag all of them. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:21, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  If Drmies or another admin thinks that tags are best not used here, feel free to delete with my permission (so G7/G6). I tagged as Menihn was editing after they blanked their talk page (which I took as I'm done here, I won't be editing any longer). Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:25, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Meieet (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quack quack (-ack). Also, compare attempts to label Elias Ashmole as "of Jewish or Muslim origin" with attempts to label Adam Weishaupt as Jewish; and general conspiracy theory mongering in line with Bcliot33's fringe beliefs. I doubt this is the only one out there, given that he had two socks active before his first account was even blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, an interest in psychiatric drugs [1], [2]. Maybe if they stayed there, they wouldn't get blocked so much. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And their implied accusation here is in line with this other sock's comments on me and Bcliot33's habit of reinterpreting minor pages as if they were major policies. Also, failure to understand BRD while hypocritically insisting that other parties are the edit warriors. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. I'm not sure what the accusation isMeieet (talk) 02:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

•  Confirmed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]