It is quite clear that this IP address is being used by Babestress, to the point where the IP has modified Babestress's user page. There is a clear lack of tact. Now that I've looked at it, it is clear that Babestress is using this IP in disputes. As an example, note this attempt to restore a merged page by the IP, subsequently followed by the sockpuppeteer's intervention. Both the IP and the account continue to operate concurrently. This should not be tolerated. It should be an open and shut case. RGloucester — ☎ 20:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Given these edits, it appears that the user is editing while logged out to evade scrutiny. I've blocked the account and IP for a week. Mike V • Talk 21:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Babestress was blocked in April, Ridland account was created in May. Recently Ridland edited Babestress's userpage to mark them as "retired" and then edited their own userpage which includes a welcome message addressed to Babestress. Look pretty ducky to me. They have a bunch of pages in common (the IP in the link is the sock who was previously reported here) too and Ridland recently vandalized someone's userpage. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 11:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC) — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 11:10, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: Looks like a duck to me. Ridland copied Babestress's userpage. [1] vs [2] connects Dogstress. TDL (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Clear WP:DUCK, same interest in articles as Babestress and the same behaviour, blocked indefinitely. MilborneOne (talk) 12:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: Everyone is blocked and tagged. Closing. TDL (talk) 00:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)