Anarul Islam(Rony) (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Aarushiyas (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Gunchuma (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Gaumata444 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Jutamarum (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Gulikha (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Vodakha3 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 223.231.63.82 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 223.231.60.224 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

All WP:SPA users creating article on same subject Rudraksh Cap-Tech. One of the user is already blocked and the IP's removed the speedy template from Rudraksh Cap-Tech earlier. The titles (Rudraksh Cap-Tech and Rudraksh Cap-Tech Ltd) are currently protected against recreation but user Gaumata444 recreated it under a different title as Rudraksh Cap-Tech Limited and user Jutamarum created an article for the founder of the same company. GSS (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This case is being reviewed by GeneralizationsAreBad as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.

•  Clerk endorsed - Please compare the named accounts - they are all promoting the same company and its personnel. GAB^gab 21:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Confirmed:
  • Aarushiyas (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Gunchuma (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Jutamarum (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Gulikha (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Vodakha3 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
•  Inconclusive: Gaumata444 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
•  No comment with respect to IP address(es). ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:07, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Also, due to a couple of factors, CU will not be useful for finding sleepers or other related accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:09, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Awaiting administrative action - Please block all the confirmed accounts indefinitely. Please use your own discretion as to whether to block Gaumata444. Thanks, GAB^gab 23:32, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• GeneralizationsAreBad: I've blocked all accounts (based on deleted contributions I"m comfortable with a block on Gaumata444). Two accounts (Gulikha and Jutamarum) I had blocked (way before any SPI) as advert socks and had tagged Jutamarum as a sock of Gulikha. Please also see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gulikha and decide how you want to tag all of these. I've left all these SPI blocks untagged, just referred the SPI in the block log. I'm closing as this now needs either CU or clerk guidance on tagging and then archiving. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 07:16, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Anarul Islam(Rony) (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

Recreation of Rudraksh Cap- Tech Limited (added space after hyphen) and Anirudh sethi (using lowercase in Surname) to trick NPP's same as other socks. GSS (talk) 10:00, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

•  Clerk note: DoRD: Did Anarul Islam(Rony) show up on your October 10 check? Thanks, GAB^gab 00:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, they did, but since they're using a completely different device, I didn't take notice of them. They're editing from a couple of the same ranges as the socks above, but are technically unrelated. Anarul Islam(Rony) is a  Confirmed match to Anarul786 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). I'll leave it to another admin or admin clerk to determine whether they're the same as this master, or whether they're related to another promotional sockfarm. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Either way, the behavior is a lock, and - sadly -  CheckUser is not magic pixie dust. Please block both. Thanks, GAB^gab 13:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Blocked.  Clerk assistance requested: Anarul Islam(Rony) is older than the account currently designated as the master. You may wish to check the previously confirmed socks to see if any are older still before moving. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:49, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • Moved and retagged. GAB^gab 18:01, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]