If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add ((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mujeerkhan)) to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
|
I think Mujeerkhan,Hassan,iFaqeer,Mysorebhai,Tipu Hero, shezaad786,indiandesi and Naziakhanum are all sock puppets of the same person, which i guess is Mujbeerakhan
Vikramji 18:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps I should expand.All of these "users" have been editing the article Tipu Sultan and the talk page of Talk:Tipu Sultan and have been reverting scholarly edits made by other users. A mediation for this article is pending on Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/September 2006/Hkelkar and there is a strong possibility that this user mujeerkhan is using multiple logins to sway the mediator's opinion by presenting a false consensus.Hkelkar 19:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: The mediator for the case has expressed his opinion regarding this matter. He also suspects that some sockpuppetry is going on. See his diff in my talk page [1]. I urge expediency regarding this case as it is presently holding off mediation regarding Tipu Sultan. Thanks.Hkelkar 19:36, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Additional information needed Please pick a code and provide the necessary diffs. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Code picked above (my opinion).Diffs should be provided shortly.Hkelkar 20:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- A few diffs, which I, as the advocate for the case, have been asked to find:
- A fairly hostile statement by Mujeerkhan - the sort of thing that could lead to blocking (IMO)
- "your breed"?? (by indiandesi
- this, Shezaad786's fifth edit, seems very developed and an experienced edit (despite his/her comments there)
- the users onvolved seem to have similar editting time periods (early morning UTC)
- These are all the links I'm prepared to search for now - there are many, many edits on the Talk:Tipu Sultan page which are all in the same vein, and all by the accused, above. As Hkelkar has mentioned above, I feel that there is "something going on". In fact, this was my gut feeling frm when I first took the case - I'd like to know whether this feeling is correct or not, based on the evidence provided above, and, hopefully, a checkuser. Thanks Martinp23 21:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed with regard to:
Also, you may wish to check the edits of Naziakhanum (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Goingindia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) which appear related.
These users appear Unrelated:
The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for that - would you be able to run another on Naziakhanum (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Goingindia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)? I agree that their edit patterns seemed dissimilar, and was surprised to find that they weren't listed here. Is it possible for a checkuser to be run with these two users and one of the confirmed, to find out mif they are socks (basically to make my mediation job simpler - I'd prefer to be able to safely balance the arguements in the light of who is a sock and who isn't, rather than, as at the moment, getting a distorted view of the situation. Thanks - Martinp23 22:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.