If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mrcineman))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

LbUT

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 02:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

LbUT's block log can be seen here. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 02:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Stale. Just like before. --Deskana (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mrcineman

[edit]
request links: view • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 21:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I first encountered LbUT when I was involved in a POV deal on the article Usana, accounts (suspected socks) were removing information about a scandal (see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mrcineman for the first checkuser). Now, Chasbern is removing the revealing info [2] [3], as LbUT's sock did in the past. LbUT's block can be seen here. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 21:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Stale. --Deskana (talk) 03:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mrcineman

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 21:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

These sockpuppets are trying to delete the same controversies on the article Usana. The most recent is Mrcineman. And they appear to be maybe employees or something, adding POV to the articles occaisionally. Here are some diffs [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]

Cheers, JetLover (talk) 21:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Mrcineman = LbUT. Voice-of-All 05:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More