First of them is certainly Jacob Peters. He started making the same changes in the same article, Holodomor denial as one of Jacob Peters puppets, Drabj:
Kaserne and Nejedly started editing simultaneously with Kwinkt. Kaserne inserted poorly sourced accusations in a BLP article of historian Robert Conquest who wrote a book about Holodomor (the subject attacked by Kwinkt-Drabj). Nejedly made massive deletions of text in article Soviet war crimes. YBM29 exists longer, also an obvious Soviet-style propaganda SPA who does nothing but reverts.Biophys (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 23 May 2008 |
More silliness on Joseph Stalin and talk page. Possibly Jakey again. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 22:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 10 May 2008 |
I was counting the minutes from when I restored "dictator" to the Stalin article to when Jakey showed up. - Merzbow (talk) 02:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 30 April 2008 |
Similar-patterned edits, pro-Communist tendentious POV-pushing, the usual crap. Yada yada yada. I'd like a quick checkuser to confirm before I block, thanks. Please see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Jacob Peters for a pile of IPs to compare against. Moreschi (talk) (debate) 21:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 4 February 2008 |
After being dormant for a while it seems Jacob Peters has returned. All of Gulijan's edits are pro-Communist POV pushing similar to edits by Jacob Peters and his multitude of banned sockpuppets. A good example: one is an edit from confirmed JP sock "Hadjin":[2] and this one from "Gulijan":[3] Both socks have somewhat similar names and both add "controversy" or "criticism" sections to these articles on historians who specialise in the crimes of Communism.--C.J. Griffin (talk) 05:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 22:30, 5 November 2007 |
Similar editing style and articles as previous socks. For example, Joseph Stalin [4], Mao Zedong [5], Vladimir Lenin [6], Mengistu Haile Mariam [7], Genocide [8], Felix Edmundovich Dzerzhinsky [9] etc. Also see his talk tage, similar complaints from other users as with previous socks:[10]Ultramarine 22:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 16:42, 27 October 2007 |
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 17:49, 24 May 2007 |
Similar editing style (see User talk:Nemda) and articles as previous socks. Great Leap Forward [11], Vladimir Lenin [12], Mitrokhin Archive and Venona project, [13], 1948 Arab-Israeli War [14].Ultramarine 17:49, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed. Dmcdevit·t 18:38, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 15:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC) |
Our old friend is back, POV pushing on his usual Soviet-related articles. There was a slew of edits from this account until early January, then it was dormant until today. He made an edit to the Vladimir Lenin article, again pushing his pro-Stalin POV [15]. The edit summary (including the edit summaries from this account in the past) are classic Peters. TheQuandry 15:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Unlikely--Mackensen (talk) 03:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 22:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC) |
This IP is probably Peters. One of his other IP socks was filling up the Talk:Mengistu Haile Mariam page with OT arguments that there is no evidence for any victims of Saddam's gassing of Halabja in Kurdistan (which is patently absurd on its face; there are mountains of evidence that at least 5000 people definitely perished in that chemical attack)... Someone else came along and deleted the conversation explaining it was a Peters sock yet again... Just now the whole OT conversation was replaced by the above IP. ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 22:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 19:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC) |
Removed sourced material on Communist leaders while dismissing it as biased [17], dismisses western sources as blatantly biased [18]. Generally shows support for a pro-communist POV while dismissing other views [19], [20]. IP appears to be similar to ones already blocked as JP socks. Heimstern Läufer 04:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 19:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC) |
More removal of the sourced material that Jacob doesn't like on the pages that he doesn't like: see [22], [23], [24]. Same pro-Soviet POV, and the edit summaries make it blatantly apparent that we've seen this user before somewhere. And the usual incivility on talk pages at [25]. If someone could get to this quickly, it would be much appreciated. Moreschi Deletion! 19:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch |
Signed 3RR page as Ploughman while editing anonymously as 68.127.38.186. Therefore, this IP should be added to the list. Rklawton 22:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch |
User removes cited info in Jacob's usual style, multiple 3RR violations, general pro-Stalin pushing, and edit warring. See for example [31][32][33][34][35][36] Ultramarine
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 18:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC) |
User has blanked sections of Vladimir Lenin in exactly the same way as multiple JP socks have. [38]. Also blanked THIS page [39]. TheQuandry 18:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed. Essjay (Talk) 06:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch |
User removes cited info from sources that Jacob loathes, same beef about Stalin not being a dictator, general pro-Stalin POV pushing, edit warring, and general trolling. See [41], [42], and [43]. Moreschi Deletion! 20:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Unrelated. Mackensen (talk) 17:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch |
Very similar POV, the user seems to have some wikiexperience despite just handful of edits Alex Bakharev 01:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: • Please provide a diff with discussion which resulted in a community ban per the requirements of code letter F. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 01:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Confirmed. Essjay (Talk) 08:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 18:43, 2 January 2007 |
See related discussion at ANI.
See contribs - identical pattern to Jacob Peters, same articles. Jacob Peters is currently blocked for over a month for sockpuppetry. Same edit warring with Stalinist POV on Joseph Stalin [45]. Here he reverts the inclusion of sources that he doesn't like. See also this, where he complains on the talk about sources he doesn't like. Identical pattern to our old friend, IMO. I could swear I've seen exactly that change before by the Jacob Peters account, just off to hunt. Almost the same edit, identical POV pushing, here by Jacob Peters. Moreschi Deletion! 18:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 02:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
Looks like another JP sock. Perhaps not as obvious as previous socks because this account has no Talk page posts, but everything else is in character - pro-Stalinist edits, same sort of broken-English incivility (this time in the edit summaries), false information in edit summaries (marking edits as 'grammatical corrections' when they aren't) etc. - Merzbow 23:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Unlikely. Essjay (Talk) 23:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
69.110.222.228's contributions are to Soviet-related topics, which are what Jacob Peters usually edits, and take a clear pro-Soviet anti-Western POV lining up with Jacob Peters's: [48], [49], [50], [51]. Perhaps most obvious is the use of the not-too-common term "agitprop" [52], which Jacob Peters also uses [53]. The tone of the IP, dismissing his opponents as illogical and spreading propoganda, is also very like Jacob Peters's. Jacob Peters has already been blocked several times for edit warring and other disruption and for sockpuppetry [54]. Heimstern Läufer 02:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed. Dmcdevit·t 02:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 23:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC) |
I find this comment by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) oddly similar to this comment by Iskra1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), given they are writing about the same sentence and deriding Alan Bullock. Note that the IP was blocked as a sockpuppet of Jacob Peters (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (at least according to 68.127.37.13's block log). Here's another comment by Iskra1 (talk · contribs) that appears to take a position similar to that taken by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs) here. This edit by Iskra1 (talk · contribs) is also a carbon-copy of this edit by 68.127.37.13 (talk · contribs). I, thus, feel convinced that Jacob Peters (talk · contribs) is once again evading a block through sockpuppetry. -- tariqabjotu 23:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Likely. Dmcdevit·t 08:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Otto Schmidt's controversial edit [55] at Robert Conquest is almost identical of several Jacob Peters edits[56][57][58] at same page. Jacob Peters is currently blocked for avoiding blocks and sockpuppeting[59][60]. So I suspect sockpuppetry to avoid block again. Staberinde 20:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Confirmed. Essjay (Talk) 03:47, 10 December 2006 (UTC)