If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DennyColt))
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


DennyColt

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 19:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

During a revert war dealing with whether or not Daniel Brandt should be able to post comments about his own biography on the talk page of said article, a new user popped out of nowhere to delete the comment twice [1] [2] when DennyColt (the user most vigorously opposion the idea of DB posting there) had used up his 3 reversions [3][4][5]. Given the extreme sensitivity of the article in question, the use of sockpuppets in such a case would be extremely inappropriate and possible disruptive to Wikipedia. Users have been notified [6][7].
--Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 19:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a sockpuppet, but not of DennyColt. I'd rather Brandt not put me up on his website. MisterHamburger 19:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Given the history of the Brandt article this is a highly credible explanation, SqueakBox 19:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Red X Unrelated --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


More