• Cicero Dog (talk · contribs)
• Ciraric (talk · contribs)
• 88.109.205.196 (talk · contribs)
• Wolf guevara (talk · contribs)
• Silent Lamb Child (talk · contribs)

All these users joined WP:CJ at a similar time, except 88.109.205.196, and made similar comments at WT:CJ. I'm not accusing them, I'm just asking for it to be glanced over. Computerjoe's talk 18:02, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The latter two are permablocked, now. Computerjoe's talk 19:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Declined. Checkuser is for serious cases of misconduct, where there is strong reason to believe two or more accounts are being operated by the same user. You must provide evidence linking the two, and demonstrate why the request rises to the level of technical investigation. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 08:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is strong evidence Cicero Dog is at least one of Wolf guevara and Silent Lamb Child: after Computerjoe blocked Wolf guevara and Silent Lamb Child last night, Cicero Dog was then autoblocked. The misconduct then relates to the discussion now at Wikipedia talk:Community Justice/Archive 2#There Must Be A New Election, where Cicero Dog, Wolf guevara and Silent Lamb Child are being represented as three separate users. However, as nobody's contesting the Wolf guevara and Silent Lamb Child blocks at this time, I'm not sure it's worth worrying about too much at the moment. Cheers --Pak21 10:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not block as I'm not a sysop. Computerjoe's talk 17:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the misinformation --Pak21 19:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons for Re-Request '

Ciraric's account was apparently comprimised by who I suspect to by Cicero Dog see, and attempts were done to so on mine and Ian13's from an IP in the same range of 88.109.205.196 (this was a password reminder email, can be provided upon request). Computerjoe's talk 17:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A similar attempt was made on my account --Pak21 19:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is quite simply not true (attepting to defend myself by the way). Ciraric was never comprimised by me. He merely used it as an excuse to cover his own tracks. I have proof which i will gladly send through email if needed. We are friends (in real life) and he used me as a scape goat to escape from his own crimes. Wolf Guevara too is not me but someone i know as is Silent Lamb Child. I have know idea about the IP adress. As for similar IPs maybe it is because we live near each other - it is only a suggestion i don't know how IP adresses work. Cicero Dog 18:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed as follows:

• 88.109.205.196, Silent Lamb Child, and Cicero Dog are without question the same user.
• Wolf guevara is quite likely the same individual attempting to avoid detection.
• There is no evidence that anyone else has used or compromised the Ciraric account; it has used a single IP without deviation. (The IP is not 88.109.205.196.) With that said, a connection between the two cannot be ruled out, nor can it be confirmed.

I would suggest referring the matter to the Administrator's Noticeboard for discussion of appropriate action. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 12:56, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 11:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

• Cicero Dog (talk · contribs)
• Dog cicero (talk · contribs)
• Code letter : F (per original checkuser listed at base of this list, and disruption)

There seems to be very little or no link other than name but the former has been blocked. CDMS 11:44, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not wish to bite newbies here, but because the requester has only been involved in things related to these accounts (bar 3 edits and userpage), may I request that CDMS (talk · contribs) is also briefly checked. Ian¹³/t 15:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed could you provide a code letter please? -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have made an attempt to code on behalf of the requester. They are welcome to change this if they do not agree. Ian¹³/t 07:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automatically withdrawn - the requester has been blocked as an obvious sockpuppet. Reasons stated here. Ian¹³/t 21:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]