• Bentheadvocate (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Magnonimous (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Code letter: F (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Magnonimous)
• Supporting evidence: Disruption on Coral calcium (Magnonimous's article of choice), account created day after Magnonimous was indefed. PouponOnToast (talk) 16:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• See also Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Magnonimous

I'm not seeing specific disruption on the mentioned article. Here's a diff of all his edits. I note there not been much/any reversion done and his edits have all be just two sessions.[1] Magnonimous' edits[2] seem to be very different - Alison ^❤ 17:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And the account timing, the obvious linguistic tics - the no overlapping edits, and the median edit times? PouponOnToast (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, provide the evidence please and remember that  CheckUser is not for fishing. Also, I note that there are no overlapping edits because Bentheadvocate began editing six weeks after Magnonimous and socks had stopped. Have you thought about opening a SSP case first? - Alison ^❤ 18:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By six weeks you mean 22 hours after the ban on Magnonimous was entered? [3] [4]. It's ok - I mean, I didn't find the time to put a tracking cookie in an email to him and then start a million threads around the internet, so he can just go right on harassing people. PouponOnToast (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gratuitous WordBomb reference aside, I was referring to the last edits being six week before - Alison ^❤ 20:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank You Alison. --BETA 20:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Deferred another checkuser for second opinion re. case - Alison ^❤ 20:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alison, are you asking for a second opinion on whether to run the check or on the results? Thatcher 16:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Emailing ... - Alison ^❤ 17:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

((Unnecessary)) - dropping my request PouponOnToast (talk) 09:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]