If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add ((Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/AlmeidaManga)) to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
|
- Additional information needed I listed your case, but it is likely a checkuser will decline the case if you have no idea who the sockmaster is. -- lucasbfr talk 21:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That's what we're trying to do here- checkuser the sockpuppet to see who the master account is. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 00:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- FWIW, I know of a previous case where Dmcdevit (talk · contribs) ran a checkuser on an account that had declared itself a sock, without any prior inkling who the sockmaster was. If necessary, I can provide the evidence. --Jaysweet (talk) 16:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: - this case is somewhat "fishing-y" but given the evidence, this is a deliberate abuse of multiple accounts per WP:SOCK and no editor has carte blanche to simply create a sock account to have a go at someone, then disappear again. It's cowardly in the extreme and - yes - it's classic good-hand/bad-hand stuff. While there were only a handful of edits and it doesn't appear to have recurred (yet), I think it's sufficient enough to name the master account.
- Confirmed that AlmeidaManga (talk · contribs) is a bad-hand sock of HouseOfScandal (talk · contribs). I thought hard about publishing the results of this check, esp. given that the good-hand account is ... well particularly good, but this edit did it for me. Cowardice and hypocrisy - it's just not on - Alison ❤ 06:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.