< July 21
July 23 >

July 22

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 22, 2024.

Unfallen (2017 film)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep/withdrawn. Thryduulf (talk) 20:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary disambiguation. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Game deck

[edit]

Not mentioned in the target article, leaving the connection between the target article and the redirect unclear. Per the edit history of the redirect, seems the intent of this term was to correlate with the subject at Handheld game console. However, this term has been WP:SEO'ed on third party search engines to apparently establish that this phrase exclusively refers to Steam Deck. (This redirect is a ((R with history)).) Steel1943 (talk) 21:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Deck-building game or maybe just Playing card (which is where Deck of cards also goes), or Card game. Googling "game deck" (including quotes) supports this. Steam deck doesn't refer to itself as a "game deck" (google results for "game deck" (no quotes) showing Steam Decks are just because the the Steam Deck plays/allows purchase of games. BugGhost🦗👻 10:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Video game demographics

[edit]

The section where this redirect targets is not currently in the target article. The target article does mention the word "demographics" 4 times, but it does not seem as though there is a proper location/section within the article to target this redirect. Also, leaving the redirect to target the base article title Video game could be unhelpful since readers would have to hunt down in various places what they are trying to find, and even then, they may not find what they are looking for. I'm thinking this redirect may be a WP:REDLINK deletion candidate. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Videogame type

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Video game genre. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 02:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The word "type" is incredibly vague/ambiguous here. Is it meant to refer to genre (action, adventure, etc.), platform (PC, console, etc), medium (cartridge, CD, digital, etc.)? No idea. Steel1943 (talk) 21:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Electronic entertainment

[edit]

The concept is not exclusive to its target. First exceptions that come to mind are Television and Film. Steel1943 (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Game trading

[edit]

Not exclusive to Video game. Could refer to any subtopic of Game with a physical (or heck, some virtual/digital in today's world) representation. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Computer and video game distinction

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At the present time, Computer game redirects to Video game. For this reason, there is no distinction by default, so leading readers to any article via this phrase can be seen as misleading. Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Home computer game

[edit]

Not sure if these redirects should be retained at their current target or be retargeted to Video game. Per the result of Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 5#Computer game, Computer game was retargeted away from PC game and to Video game. Considering the current states of the articles Home computer and Personal computer ("PC" in the current target), it does not seem as though the usage of the phrase "home computer" exclusively refers to "personal computer". Steel1943 (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the target works with the significant home computer game history on the PC game article and is not comparable to the computer game redirect result. A disambiguation hatnote was added to the video game article by me, maybe add something similar to PC game? IgelRM (talk) 08:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplayer Online Adventure Game

[edit]

The word "adventure" is nowhere in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is meant to refer or define. Steel1943 (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Online multi-player gamers

[edit]

This redirect seems vague/unclear, specifically since the redirect uses the word "gamers" instead of "games", as well as the word "online". Between several topics including the current target, Multiplayer video game, Massively multiplayer online game, Gamer and/or subtopics, amongst others, it does not seem clear where this redirect should target, if anywhere. Steel1943 (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Land 2

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wouldn't it be wacky if "land" was a common word in game boy game titles, "2" was a common number in game sequels, and there were at least 2 other games with both of them? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

off the top of my head, i can name
i don't know if this could be deleted as a vague search or dabified, unless someone wants to see if there's a sequel to the concept of land cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Priestess

[edit]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Re-target to Ordination of women. This is for consistency with Female priest, as agreed upon at Talk:Priestess_(disambiguation)#Requested_move_25_August_2023. Discussion of the other redirect occurred at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_15#Female_priest. There are concerns about the appropriateness of the current target to house a section for the target of this redirect. See Talk:Priest#Priestesses. 174.92.25.207 (talk) 19:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Priestess Noel Ann (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Super Mario Bros. 35"

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 23:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

overuse of quotation marks is a tony zaret thing. this is apparently the result of a botched move cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Assassination of Donald Trump

[edit]

This has twice been deleted as an attack page, once by Liz and once by Isabelle Belato. While it does impute a motive to the gunman, it also strikes me as a plausible redirect. Hence my taking it here for further discussion as to a correct outcome. If deletion is decided to be appropriate I would suggest the page be salted. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - plausible search term. I don't see this as eligible for G10 and I don't agree that the existence of the redirect means, in any way, that Wikipedia is saying the assassination was successful. For those who think there was an "assassination of Donald Trump," the redirect to the article about the attempted assassination will educate them. Misleading and inaccurate redirect titles that redirect the reader to accurate articles are helpful. It's just like "Trump assassination" or other variations. Levivich (talk) 03:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Looks as though we have another candidate for deletion. Space4Time3Continuum2x🖖 12:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think it should be deleted then nominate it, but I will recommend keeping that for exactly the same reasons as I am recommending keeping this one - it's useful and not at harmful. Thryduulf (talk) 16:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sącz dialect

[edit]

Not found at target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and speedy. This whole region is very complicated dialectally and in terms of terminology, and so things had to change. Vininn126 (talk) 19:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lebanese Forces Cross

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not found at target article. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Calls for Joe Biden to suspend his 2024 United States presidential campaign

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30#Calls for Joe Biden to suspend his 2024 United States presidential campaign

Vocal minority

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this term is the exact opposite of the article it links to -- FMSky (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and add special Rcat. Catching the opposite of something is a valid reason to create a redirect pointing to the opposite of the redirect (for as long as we don't have an article about it specifically). However, we usually tag such redirects with ((R from opposite)) to improve reverse loopup capabilities, and this is what we should do here as well. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Varsity (upcoming film)

[edit]

I have no idea what the idea is behind this redirect but in my opinion it is useless The Banner talk 16:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created Varsity (upcoming film), someone else separately created Prime Target (TV series). It is my understanding that these are for the same production, and Prime Target is the correct title for broadcast. Hildreth gazzard (talk) 17:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Varsity (TV series) per Cyclone. 88.235.215.238 (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Power flower

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30#Power flower

North West Leicestershire by-election, 2010

[edit]

Never happened. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C F A 💬 17:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mystic Ruins

[edit]

either vague, or more closely associated with sonic adventure cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:20, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 21:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary creation of a redirect that merits deletion. Intrisit (talk) 16:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I don't find it too far-fetched that someone will only capitalise the first letter. Procyon117 (talk) 19:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Active worlds in the Solar System

[edit]

not the biggest volcano nerd out there, so sorry in advance for any uninformed claims, but from reading the target and other related articles, there seem to be no other celestial bodies that meet the criteria of being a "world", currently having volcanic activity, and being in the solar system, though mercury is a strong "maybe". on another note, i'm not entirely sure "active world" is a term used to refer to volcanic activity, and the creator of the redirect (who seems to have made it as an essay) seemed to have also been referring to geysers, and counting moons as "worlds". for results. wikipedia gave me an mmo (shoutouts to hitomi fujiko), google gave me assorted apps and brands, and wiktionary gave me nothing. unless there's a detail i'm missing or this is a scientific term that refers to celestial bodies with volcanic activity, i'll vote for deletion cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

on this note, i should mention "volcanically active worlds", a redirect that specifies the type of activity it refers to and does not specify the location. jury's still out on the definition of world though, but it's a step in the right direction cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a better redirect at this time as is this not a redirect with potential.?
Jury is out on definition of volcano as noted in the article itself and presumably meaning of world. Planet and moon are more accurate terms. Many "worlds" are active in some way as they are above absolute zero and may have internal or external entropy sources that disturb their surface however that is defined. Someone could get a good article out of this so my vote is to retain in hope someone will do the job, unless there is a better redirect. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
drifting into personal opinion territory by now, but wouldn't returning to red be better for that? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 18:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think "Active worlds" is too ambiguous to justify keeping "Active worlds in the Solar System" as a redirect to Volcano#Volcanoes on other celestial bodies. I also have not found any other suitable redirect targets because the problem is the lack of meaning in the redirect's title rather than a problem with any targets of the redirect. I recommend delete. GeoWriter (talk) 11:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vice President Vance

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 16:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is misleading. Vance is currently not the Vice President nor has he ever been the Vice President. Pages like this for candidates who have been VP were not created until after the election. Wozal (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Redirects are not required to be neutral (WP:RNEUTRAL) and the article explains that he is a nominee in the first sentence. This redirects helps confused readers get correct information. Ca talk to me! 16:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ca Are you reading a different WP:RNEUTRAL than I am? In most cases, non-neutral but verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. There are no sources to verify the name "Vice President Vance", and none are likely to be proffered. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Here again, WP:RNEUTRAL makes it clear that an established term that is used in WP:RS are what should be an exception and kept, not made-up terms that aren't sourced. —Locke Cole • t • c 02:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fox News: What do political strategists think of a Vice President Vance?
Republican Governor's Association: “Together President Trump and Vice President Vance will fight tirelessly..."
Dayton Daily News: “I think a lot of his speech will talk about the vision of President Trump and Vice President Vance...”
Politico: But what could a Vice President Vance mean for Europe?
WSJ: Some Vance critics say a Vice President Vance's devotion to intellectualizing Trumpism could put him... Ca talk to me! 06:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of popular news media use "Vice President Vance" as a term for a hypothetical future where Trump and Vance wins. Readers may see these terms and search it up on Wikipedia, neglecting to add "nominee". It is not misleading since the article target corrects the mistake, in the off-chance that the mistaken reader (probably non-American who never heard about this person) genuinely thinks Vance is the current Vice President. Ca talk to me! 06:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's my fault for not being specific enough, but sources that speak of a hypothetical name aren't really sufficient to justify this. This term isn't "established" as all uses are either direct quotations of politicians hoping for this or indirect uses just using the term as a "what-if" title. And to some extent WP:CRYSTALBALL applies here, obviously. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I also do not understand the vague references to CRYSTALBALL. Wikipedia aren't claiming any predictions by having a incorrect or hypothetical future search term lead an article that has the correct context.
I see readers using this redirect for two reasons:
1) Clueless readers thinking Vance is really the vice president due to being unfamiliar with US politics or being misled by headlines like "What do political strategists think of a Vice President Vance?".
2) Those who know Vance is a nominee, but still neglected to add it as a keyword since it is longer.
It is useful and therefore fulfills a redirect's purpose. I won't discuss further since I'm clearly in the minority. Ca talk to me! 15:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He is only a nominee for vice president. If he becomes vice president, then fair enough. But not right now. Procyon117 (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added/bundled Vice President J. D. Vance into this nomination. Steel1943 (talk) 21:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete both per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:SNOW. —Locke Cole • t • c 05:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (and for the record, I would support the deletion of President Kamala Harris as well). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:30, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Scared Silly

[edit]

normally a little vague, but as a name, it seems more primarily associated with an open season movie cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:45, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig per Fieari - no clear target BugGhost🦗👻 14:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paper Bowser

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 29#Paper Bowser

FX (African TV channel)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Refine to FX (international)#South Africa. Jay 💬 15:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since Rosguill saw no worth in having content for this title out of GNG concerns, I've listed it here for a possible deletion. Intrisit (talk) 15:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Economic Times (India)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 17:45, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting deletion of unnecessary redirect created in 2013. Intrisit (talk) 14:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Readers may believe there be multiple publication with the name "The Economic Times", and add a natural-looking disambiguator (India) to disambiguate it. Seems clear and useful to me. Ca talk to me! 16:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

All-Star Batman and Robin

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 29#All-Star Batman and Robin

Bullitt (album)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bullitt (disambiguation). Jay 💬 15:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is also Bullitt (soundtrack), and this redirect is too confusing. saebou (talk) 11:41, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Leica MD-2

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 18:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right now only seems to be mentioned in Leica M1. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Republican blue

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30#Republican blue

Safe state

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 30#Safe state

Apple reinvents the phone.

[edit]

Unlikely search term. This appears to be the official slogan of the iPhone. Mia Mahey (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Shhhnotsoloud. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete The slogan is unnecessarily long and clearly promotional. Instead something like Phones by Apple Inc. might be useful. IgelRM (talk) 13:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
More