The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Misty Williams → Misty (Pokémon)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

same rationale as below, different character, wrong surname (apparently, results seem torn between williams and waterflower) cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 16:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C F A 💬 20:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

for the record, "below" refers to "brock harrison", a name seemingly originating from a fanfic, that may or may not have been coincidentally mentioned before by brock's english voice actor cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 12:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This name is not mentioned on the target page and the low page views suggests it isn't a common search term either. --RL0919 (talk) 16:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. This was seen as a plausible search term, but there was difficulty in finding sources. Jay 💬 13:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Brock Harrison → Brock (Pokémon)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

i do not want to elaborate on how many layers of obscure fanon this is, so i hope the explanation can begin and end at "that's fanmade" cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 16:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there's apparently an old interview featuring Brock's VA where he mentions this information, but it seems pretty trivial regardless. Linking the archived link of the interview that I could find, but admittedly I'm not sure if this would sway anything either way. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...huh. won't debate the canonicity of that (debatable as its canonicity is, see word of saint paul on tv tropes), but i will suggest not risking adding it to avoid enabling that side of the pokémon fandom fanfic fandom cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 01:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as very obscure synonym even if true --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I don't intend to vote on this, but it is plausable that the surname was given to the character in some international dubbings. At least I personally have a recollection of this being the case and thus the R being a plausable search term, but it would be very difficult to verify now, due to a need to search potential distorted/localised alterations of the name. Respublik (talk) 21:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:22, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and Lenticel. Obscure synonym, and useless due to a lack of mention at target. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Everyone around the world, c'mon - Yahoo! - It's a celebration! → Celebration (Kool & the Gang song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not the first line of the song. Totally implausible to use a space dash space before and after the "yahoo" with an exclamation point, followed by the rest of "it's a celebration". The vastly more plausible means of reaching this page is by typing "Celebration" in the search bar, as the Kool & the Gang song is option #5. People searching for this particular set of three lyrics, will be disappointed that the full extent of their search term is not discussed at the target page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this hurts my grammar bones. kill it with fire cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Overly detailed lyric with dashes, etc., that is not discussed on the page. (The more basic version of the lyric, "Everyone around the world, come on", is mentioned there and would be more plausible.) --RL0919 (talk) 16:17, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Well you can tell by the way I use my walk, I'm a woman's man, no time to talk → Stayin' Alive  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Invalid use of an "R from lyric", which are designed to be for "redirects to a source that discusses the lyric" at the target page. People who search for this instead of "Stayin' alive" are looking for particular information about the lyric in question that they used as a deliberate search term; which, will disappoint readers when they find nothing related to it at the page. We do not generally redirect lyrics to songs on the premise that they "are lyrics for the songs", even IF it is the first two lines of the song. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Overly long lyric that is not discussed on the target page. --RL0919 (talk) 21:28, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 19:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Not a problem → Parker Lewis Can't Lose  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Currently no mention of this... shockingly common phrase, at the target article. With zero context for incoming readers, this is a misleading and WP:SURPRISEing redirect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. if anything, the line is more iconic to the mother series (where it's actually "no problem here") cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This phrase is far too common to redirect to a specific source, let alone one where it's not considered iconic enough to warrant a mention in the article. A surprising redirect indeed. Glades12 (talk) 08:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Far too generic to be directed to this specific series, especially when it isn't discussed on the target page. --RL0919 (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Lager, lager, lager, mega-mega-white thing → Born Slippy Nuxx  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No reason to use commas, and then switching to hyphens make this spelling variant totally implausible and unexpectable. We don't typically redirect lyrics to the songs that they originated from, unless the lyric has specific significance and references specifically directed to the importance of the lyric, which doesn't seem to be the case here (the only mention of this is taken from a reference's quote by happenstance, seemingly). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Actually if you know this song then using a mix of commas and hyphens isn't implausible - it's sort of a list of four items, tree of which are "lager" and the fourth is "mega-mega-white thing". People search for songs based on the part of the lyrics they can remember (I do this a lot) but external search engines are much better equipped to deal with such searches than Wikipedia is. If someone does want to read the Wikipedia article about the song they can search after learning the title if it isn't in their search results. Thryduulf (talk) 18:12, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• How's the world treating you, Norm? → Norm Peterson  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this phrase at the target article. People who know of this phrase would certainly know of the character called "Norm". With zero context for this search term, this redirect will disappoint readers who use it and realize after scrolling the entire article for Norm Peterson that there is no mention of the search term they used to reach the article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Pointless. Should there be an article, or a redirect, for every catchphrase (or utterance) of someone notable enough for an article? Pointless even if mentioned in the article. Blood, toil, tears and sweat, maybe. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 00:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, now, I wouldn't say that → Fibber McGee and Molly  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this phrase at the target article. Zero context for people who use this search term, and end up at a target where the phrase they searched for has zero mentions, and zero presumable importance if its never been included since 2002. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Relatively generic phrase that isn't mentioned in the target article. And there probably isn't much searching for phrases from radio shows that went off the air over 50 years ago. --RL0919 (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 19:10, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll be all around in the dark. I'll be everywhere. Wherever you can look - wherever there's a fight, so hungry people can eat, I'll be there. → The Grapes of Wrath (film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of these three sentences at the target page. Totally implausible for people to use this phrase as a means of navigating to the Grapes of Wrath, instead of just typing... "the grapes of wrath". Wikipedia has never had a practice of creating a redirect for the first line, or last line, or whichever line in between of a book, and targeting it to the book itself. The only time this could POSSIBLY happen is if the line in question had some type of significance to be substantially mentioned, or perhaps it has its very own standalone article and notability? But absolutely not for an unmentioned string of three sentences, with no context at the target page. The small number of people who'd use this search term instead of "the grapes of wrath", would be disappointed to have no information related to their exact search phrase. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I sometimes use a notable (and in this case, a culturally iconic) line, if I can't quite recall the film I am searching for in internet search engines.Halbared (talk) 18:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. In addition to being another overlong quote that is not in the target page, this quote from the movie is just a rephrasing of dialogue that is also in the novel. --RL0919 (talk) 18:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm only three and a half years old. → The Abbott and Costello Show  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The only mention of this phrase at the target article is that "it was often quoted in Looney Tunes and Tex Avery's cartoons. It appears on multiple other pages, but there's really no benefit towards redirecting it anywhere, as it seems to be far more appropriate to let the search results do it's thing, (or better yet: type the quote into Google instead, as there's zero guarantee that a redirect exists for any given quote), rather than lock people into a subjective target that only provides a sentence worth of context (an average amount compared to the other Wikipedia pages out there). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not only does this phrase appear in several articles, what is presented in those articles suggests this target might be a misrepresentation of the catchphrase's history. According to the article on Billy Gray (comedian), he originated the phrase while playing a character on Abbott and Costello's radio show, not the TV show discussed in the target article. Another article links the phrase to a different radio program, The Baby Snooks Show. Without a clear target, I agree with leaving this to general search. --RL0919 (talk) 21:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 19:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, I'm the Nostalgia Critic. I remember it, so you don't have to. → Nostalgia Critic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of this quote at the target page. Totally implausible that someone would type this looking for the Nostalgia Critic general topic (as opposed to the specific quote they typed in), as anyone who knows this phrase already knows who the Nostalgia Critic is. Indeed, their name is already spelled out in the fourth and fifth words of this unmentioned two-sentence redirect. The second sentence becomes totally unnecessary, and also disappointing to people who type this entire thing out as there is zero context or significance about Nostalgia Critic's intro discussed anywhere at the target page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"implausible", the search may not be. his intro line is kind of a pretty big meme (not for any good reasons, mind you). still, not mentioned, so... strong eh cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 17:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's implausible for people searching for information on the Nostalgia Critic, to use the entire opening monologue of the Nostalgia Critic, instead of searching for the two words of "nostalgia critic". As you point out, the intro has been used for memes in the past, so people searching for it INSTEAD of just typing "nostalgia critic" into the search bar, are likely looking for coverage of the phrase (which we have zero of on Wikipedia). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 18:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wait a minute, it's punctuated wrong, delete cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Considering the intro includes the guy's name, this is just writing a bunch of irrelevant text to get to the same spot. It'd be like writing out the Angry Video Game Nerd's theme song to get to the article on him. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 00:36, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Long quote, not mentioned in the target article, and the name of the target article is already in the quote begging to be searched for directly. --RL0919 (talk) 21:41, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• And awaaay we go! (catchphrase) → Jackie Gleason  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Totally implausible to type three "a"s due to it being a personal interpretation of something this person once said. A redirect with "away" doesn't exist, which is the more natural way of typing this. A "catchphrase" disambiguator is misleading as the target page is not about a catchphrase, but a person. While the phrase does appear at the target article, every mention is at the end of an unsourced paragraph. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A redirect for this phrase with normal spelling is reasonable – it appears at his gravesite and on a statue of him – but the 'aaa' is not. --RL0919 (talk) 21:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 19:08, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Train leaving on Track Five for Anaheim, Azusa and Cuc-amonga! → The Jack Benny Program  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Near replica of a deleted redirect, my position in the previous deletion discussion is still true that a random hyphenation makes this a totally unlikely means of searching especially when the "Cucamonga" version without a hyphen doesn't even exist. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete per the previous rfd cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 18:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If the previous redirect - which is the same save for two characters being swapped - was deleted as implausible, then so's this one. The fact that Google doesn't return anything useful for this puts a full stop on it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 00:38, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Changing the some capitalization and placement of a hyphen doesn't make this any more plausible than the one that was already deleted. --RL0919 (talk) 21:43, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ay-thang-jaw! → Arthur Askey  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Does not appear anywhere in the text. This personal interpretation of a particular phrase does not lend well as a redirect, no indication that people would type this, and Wikipedia is not Wikiquote. We do not have any context about a "thang" "jaw" at the target article, and the pronounciation of "yaw" (which exists in the article with zero references, and should honestly just be cut right now as totally unnecessary information), appears only one time. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The catchphrase "Ay-thang-yaw" (not "Ay-thang-jaw!") appears in the lead section, with other catchphrases. These all need sourcing in the main article before any redirects are considered. I think this redirect should be deleted, espcially since its spelling and exclamation mark are very dubious. Also, shouldn't 'Template:R from catchphrase' be used, in any case? Masato.harada (talk) 17:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Implausible spelling that does not appear in the target article. --RL0919 (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You're a haa-aa-aa-aard man, McGee! → The Great Gildersleeve  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Totally implausible to type two a's, followed by a hyphen, followed by two a's, and etc, to represent a prolonged sound. The letters "haa" only appear in the article once, in an unsourced personal interpretation of what this probably sounded like. Besides that, there's no other information for this search term, with no indication or claim that it is notable (no sources present in relation to it). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Henry-y-y-y! Hen-ry Al-drich! → The Aldrich Family  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Almost identical version to a previously deleted redirect (see: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30#Hen-reeeeeeeeeeeee! Hen-ree Al-drich!), but instead of 13 E's, it's a "y" followed by a hyphen, followed by a "y", followed by a hyphen, followed by a "y", followed by a hyphen, followed by a "y", followed by an exclamation point. From there, the name is separated with hyphens and makes this a highly implausible search term due to this stylization being highly unreplicable and impractical. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Kallipateira of Rhodes. Jay 💬 13:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Kallipateira → Diagoras of Rhodes#Kallipateira  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is presently an article on Kallipateira of Rhodes, and I think it might be better to point this to that article than to a section on the article about her father. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• obvious repoint to Kallipateira of Rhodes as the primary subject. Mangoe (talk) 11:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Strogg in Quake 4 → Quake 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

not present in the target cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Revert without prejudice to AfD or merge per WP:BLAR. According to Talk:Quake 4#Enemies "it was agreed to merge the Strogg and the Quake 4 pages together" however I can't find that discussion nor does it appear that the content was actually merged. Thryduulf (talk) 14:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  i was more so concerned with notgameguide tbh. those redirects usually get deleted over that cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 15:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That would be a rationale for deleting it at AfD, which is the correct venue to discuss deleting article content. Thryduulf (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, agreeing with Cogsan that it would be inappropriate to restore this content due to WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. I note that because this is a redirect (and has been since 2007), this is the correct venue. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The article was redirected in 2007 and then again in 2009. If the subject is not mentioned anywhere, then this thing should be deleted, considering the existence of an article about the subject of this redirect is a clear WP:NOTGUIDE violation. Steel1943 (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ^Complex/_Rational 07:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Brühl-Vochem–Cologne-Godorf Harbour railway → de:Bahnstrecke Brühl-Vochem–Köln-Godorf Hafen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Likely not needed. Its sole use was on Template:West Rhine Railway, which I changed to use ((interlanguage link)) as is used for other entries in the template (although a bot may change it back, since this soft redirect exists). Additionally, ((soft redirect)) is not used in mainspace per WP:SOFTSIS, so the template should be updated if this page is kept. Ost (talk) 06:26, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete soft redirects to other language projects are almost never useful and this is not an exception. Also per WP:REDLINK. Thryduulf (talk) 10:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes#Redirects (soft) to other language versions of Wikipedia. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 07:53, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).