The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, as per author request. J Milburn (talk) 23:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Joe Lomonaco → Family Guy (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Little known actor who has made some very minor appearances in Family Guy, to which the redirect points, but is not mentioned in the article. I don't really see the value of the redirect, which is somewhat misleading, especially as he may have appeared elsewhere (though a Google search doesn't throw up much). J Milburn (talk) 23:05, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nomination. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 00:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete even the character article does not mention him meaning that his roles are likely so minor that very few people would look him up.--70.24.209.180 (talk) 01:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. Gage (talk) 07:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the connection doesn't seem verifiable / notable, and with nothing in the target, we're not giving people any info about him.  Chzz  ►  08:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as misleading (not mentioned); even if there had been a passing mention then deletion would still be appropriate. There are limited circumstances where redirecting a single role actor to that role is correct and that would require, as a starting point, at least some useful bio information which there is not, here. Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Misplaced request; this is for redirect discussion only; move discussion belongs over at WP:RM.  Chzz  ►  08:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Shelf bra → Cupless bra (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Need to move cupless bra here. Google searches for "shelf bra' are twice that of "cupless bra". Since they are the same item of lingerie, the redirect should be reversed. — btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speeedy Close this need to be at WP:RM.--70.24.209.180 (talk) 03:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 16:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• 1965 Gator Bowl (December) → Gator Bowl (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Deletion: "If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. In such a case, it is better that the target article contain a redlink than a redirect back to itself." —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 02:06, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nomination. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; it might be worth checking if it will still an appropriate redlink in Template:Texas Tech bowl games and Template:Gator Bowl navbox.  Chzz  ►  08:24, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.