The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beatles Madame Tussauds, London.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is listed as all rights reserved on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 00:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stultz and Levine after returning from Havana in 1928.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is listed as cc-by-nc-nd on Flickr. The Flickr uploader appears to attempt to claim that the copyright holder is someone other than the Flickr uploader, so the Flickr uploader isn't able to license the image in the first place. Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Now licensed as non-free. — ξ^xplicit 01:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wilmer Lower Stultz 1928.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See #File:Stultz and Levine after returning from Havana in 1928.jpg above: a crop of the same image. Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:FFD. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:10, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Properly licensed now. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seijin shiki girls.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is listed as cc-by-nc on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arko Pravo Mukherjee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims as own work, but the image seems to be a crop of a larger photo widely spread across the internet on various sites. See [1] as one example. Whpq (talk) 20:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anwesshaa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims to be copyright holder but the image appears to be from an album or poster. See [2] and [3]. Whpq (talk) 20:33, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:KRMovies.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder of this company logo. That is doubtful. However, the logo itself consists of simply geometric shapes and a two letters, so it may not be copyrightable. Whpq (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red mango 2284951569 c2b80c9c3c.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is listed as all rights reserved on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sourabh Goho.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader is claiming to be copyright holder, but a version of this image is used at the subject's web site. See [4]. Whpq (talk) 20:40, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rudranil Ghosh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader claims to be the copyright holder, however this same editor has made the same claim on other images for which the claim as copyright holder is extremely dubious. It appears that the editor is simply uploading photos and claiming them as his own. No reason to believe that this photo is any different. Whpq (talk) 20:42, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sempervivum arachnoideum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• First published in 1976, so unfree in the United States. In order to be free in the United States, publication before 1976 is required. Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep it was taken on February 27, 2011 ... maybe you need to slow down, your cutting and pasting the wrong deletion rationales. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raining.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The summary reads www.twallacedesign.com. I'm not sure if the uploader means that the picture comes from that website and that the image therefore might be unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.