The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Original created image. TLSuda (talk) 01:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:GenScouting in Sikkim.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a scouting logo and is not necessarily under a free license as shown. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-it's absolutely not, it's kayfabe, something I designed as a placeholder image, cobbled from other ideas. In fact we can't verify what the actual image is supposed to look like, that's why it's a placeholder and not used in any articles.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Synthetic men of mars burroughs cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Date of first publication is 1940, license incorrect." from notes on image, anyone want to check for renewals?. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:18, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, image copyright not renewed. TLSuda (talk) 01:35, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASM-cutting cake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Stated to be under an NC license in the image notes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll update this accordingly for public domain, I'm not finding any copyright renewal date from its cicra 1927 date by the Los Angeles Times

SteamWiki (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:IJN L2D3a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Only probably attributed to US sources, further information required in order to prove the status claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mm secor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Disclaimer: This image was permitted to be uploaded by Eagle Trunks Designs via request. However, this image may NOT be used unless with the permission of the owner stated." from image notes, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ust old entrance.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Although not seemingly renewed, the image notes suggest there is ann uncertainty about the Philippine status of this image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:UST Intramuros Old Side.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Although not US renewed, the image notes indicate there is an uncertainty about the Phillipine status of the image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept- OTRS permission received. Image is freely licenced - Peripitus (Talk) 07:48, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The licensing was deemed insufficient for Commons, and so a local review is requested. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - The file has a rather confusing history. It was originally uploaded here as a non-free file with a deficient FUR but the original upload indicates that the site license said "The following images may be used by media, individuals, schools and other organisations free-of-charge." The link to that page was titled "Hi Res Imagery (copy right free archive of hi resolution digital photos)", as was the source page itself. Because the file was uploaded as non-free it was nominated for speedy deletion. Discussion subsequently commenced on the file's talk page and continued there until it was realised the image was free and the main problem was that navigation to the copyright notice, and the page itself, was difficult due to poor design of the website. The file's licensing was changed and an editor then uploaded the file to commons. It was deleted from commons not simply because the licensing was deemed insufficient, the deletion note specifically notes that the license "is not free enough for Commons. It does not mention derivative works or free comm". I assume that "comm" refers to commercial use, however the license specifically says "and other organisations free-of-charge". Specifying media and "other organisations" pretty much covers any use. The media is typically commercial use. I became involved after the initial discussion on File talk:PeterBethune with Earthrace.JPG but was able to confirm the licensing was as the uploader indicated. Unfortunately, as I explained on the file's talk page,[1] sometime after the image was uploaded to commons the source website was reworked and many images were moved to a blog. Unfortuntely this image disappeared in the process. However, it was initially released as a free so there should be no reason why it is not free now. However, I have contacted Earthrace regarding use of the image and the initial response is positive. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless OTRS permission is obtained. Nowhere has the file been released under a specific free license, and it is therefore not sufficient licensing. "Copy right free" does not denote a specific license, or if it is in the public domain. The "free of charge" comment does not necessarily mean in the public domain, it could mean royalty free. If an editor can get evidence of permission from Earthrace sent to OTRS, then this issue is mute. Unless and until that time, this file's license is unacceptable. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images uploaded to Wikipedia don't have to be in the public domain and it was never claimed that the file was in the public domain. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Images do have to be released under a free license, and no license is mentioned anywhere for this file. Copy Right Free has no meaning whatsoever, although some attempt to covey that means public domain. TLSuda (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that you're being overly pedantic here. There is no "official" requirement for anybody to conform to any specific license when releasing images. What is important is that they make their intention clear and "The following images may be used by media, individuals, schools and other organisations free-of-charge" is pretty clear to anyone who speaks English. --AussieLegend (✉) 19:31, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Permission has now been received from Earthrace and I've forwarded that to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. The email specifically says "Earthrace is happy to license the file https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PeterBethune_with_Earthrace.JPG for use on Wikipedia under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) license." --AussieLegend (✉) 19:09, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BaghdadUniversity.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is clearly a screenshot of a website. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:25, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adira Suhaimi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image in this same resolution is on a number of sites including here with dates that predate the upload here Peripitus (Talk) 10:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aditya Chopra, Sidharth Roy Kapur & Karan Johar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image sections are credited to "Aditya Chopra (Yash Raj Films), Sidharth Roy Kapur (UTV Motion Pictures) & Karan Johar (Dharma Productions). The parts of this are not free. Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai Mirror 27.12.2008.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• scan of the Mumbai Mirror 27.12.2008 Peripitus (Talk) 10:56, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albertjack.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is online (https://scontent-a-nrt.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/1011142_10201504783170168_127393603_n.jpg ) at a higher resolution than here. It's either unfree or might need a permissions email Peripitus (Talk) 11:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chad Troutwine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "From an outside website, not self made. License invalid" from note left on image description page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mjhy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Unlikely to be selfmade by M.J. Hyland as she is the subject of the photo." from notes left on the image description page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:33, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vyacheslav Arhipov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "no information on this file, unlikely to be self made, license incorrect." from notes left on the image description page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Izzy Westbury England Portrait.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Possibly unfree, uploader does not claim ownership, yet licenses with "self-cc-0". Review needed." Note left on image page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:IAR 111 cgi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "License not correct - unlikely this is self made." note left on image description page. - in fact this looks like a commerical render for promotional purposes. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:I.C.B.C.Executive.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "License incorrect (not self made)." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woodturning Scraper 1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "uploader states "no profit allowed" although released into PD. The two are contradictory. Some of his other uploads of tools do not have this disclaimer." - The disclaimer has an implied NC term which is not typically compatible with Wikipedia. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll fix that. I didn't really understand what the liscencing meant when I uploaded this. It's public domain, free for all purposes. Kamocat (talk) 18:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File now moved to Commons - thanks for your help. Deadstar (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bgarcas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "no description of origin, does not look self made." note on image description page, Lo res so may have been a web-scrape. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BFTpic1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Flickr source not given" - note on media description page, shot has a degree of professional staging, and there's a logo/watermark top right. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saboteur 2 card game.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is clearly a photograph of the card game and thus a derivative work of it. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BackOfBarneyschool.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "unclear copyright. Unlikely to be selfmade (no exif, small size). Deadstar (talk) 14:07, 20 August 2013 (UTC)"- note on media description page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:BT engine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Unclear copyright status. Missing template indicating image not self made. Deadstar (talk) 08:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)" note on media description page. Would assume good faith, but OTRS desirable. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vienna & Bratislava 332.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This looks to be a photo of a picture, in which case user does not have the rights to release the image. Cannot be hosted on Commons. Deadstar (talk) 15:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)"- note on media description page. Given photo quality willing to assume good faith, that this is an older photo of the uploaders.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sybiil Shearer by Helen Morrison.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OTRS permission needed that uploader is copyright holder of the "image. No date for the image, no date of first publication. Deadstar (talk) 13:41, 28 January 2014 (UTC)" - note on media description page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent an email to the Morrison-Shearer foundation to see if they can help. ([2] Deadstar (talk) 08:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pianalbanesi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "no source mentioned, not likely self made. Original file looks like a button. Deadstar (talk) 13:00, 11 March 2014 (UTC)" , note on media description page, Further this looks like a staged photo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.