The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bethan Perry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyright notice in the image. Eeekster (talk) 01:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montsouris Park Purity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Statue from 1955 by a Greek sculptor, placed in France. Copyrighted in source country. Copyrighted in source country also in 1996, and thus copyrighted in the U.S. by virtue of the URAA. Lupo 08:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep as non-free. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:13, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evergreenva.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This booklet was first published in London in 1930. I don't know who drew the tree, but it appears that everyone involved in the play died less than 70 years ago. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The OTRS tag says that OTRS accepted the file. But if the file is deleted from commons, please move it to en.Wikipedia as a fair use file, as it is the sole visual identification for the article Ever Green. -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  OTRS accepted that VandA photographed the booklet and are willing to freely license the photo, but that doesn't address the concern I have with the image. As for non-free use, I think that would be acceptable here, since it's the flyer for the premier of the musical. Someone would just have to write a non-free-use rationale. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: As Ssilvers pointed out, this can probably be used under our non-free content criteria. (If so, it should not be deleted.) I have updated the image description page to reflect this. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 17:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Children Mayon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image tagged as CC-3.0 which is almost certainly incorrect; image source is listed as UNICEF Philippines. Listing here instead of speedying because I'm not certain how UNICEF licenses their work. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that several other images by the same uploader have the same potential issue: File:Enduro.jpg, File:SchoolMyanmarnew.jpg, File:Enduronew.jpg, File:Crowthorne.jpg, File:RRSLondonnursery.jpg, File:Millfields.jpg, File:Motherbaby.jpg, File:Babyfeed.jpg, File:Cefran centre.jpg, File:ChildreninSwaziland.jpg, File:Jose-Panganiban-National-High-School.jpg, File:Breastfeeding-Camarines-Norte.jpg. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:23, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all as copyvios. UNICEF's Legal information states "UNICEF reserves all copyrights on material on its Web pages, including photographs and graphic designs." – Quadell ^(talk) 13:56, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Untitled, 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a painting used on the page of Linn Meyers. Based on another file they uploaded (File:Linn Meyers.jpg) they don't seem to be the artist. ALH (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete INeverCry 18:20, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lee Richardson in 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Richard Marz at conference .jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Ted Morton in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Robin Campbell in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Janis Tarchuk in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Luke Ouellette in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Jack Hayden in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Richard Marz in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Mary Anne Jablonski in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Ron Liepert in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Thomas Lukaszuk in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Moe Amery in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Frank Oberle in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Janice Sarich in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Fred Horne in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Len Webber in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Ron Stevens in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:George Groeneveld in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Teresa Woo-Paw in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Neil Brown in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Ray Prins in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Ty Lund in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Rob Renner in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Len Mitzel in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Yvonne Fritz in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Evan Berger in 2008.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Manmeet Bhullar in 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Some time ago, Imparo (talk · contribs) uploaded a large number of photos of Canadian politicians. Almost none of them make any claim as to the source or author of the photos. Most of them appear to be studio pictures taken against the same backdrop, although a few of them are from elsewhere and one of them - File:Richard Marz at conference .jpg - looks to have been taken by someone in an audience. At File:David Hancock in 2008.jpg, Imparo said, "This image is part of the media package provided for each candidate of the Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta. It has been released into the public domain by the party and the candidates, who are now, subsequently, sitting MLAs. Permission to use said images has been granted by the individual." There is an OTRS ticket - 2008072910032107 - that concerns these images, and on the basis of that ticket, they have largely sat unmolested for five years. A few of them have been deleted here and there, including Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_September_22#File:Peter_Sandhu_in_2008.jpg (you can read Sven Manguard's characterization of the OTRS ticket at this discussion). I have been told that I can say of the ticket that it does not clearly state who the author/source is of the images, does not clearly assert ownership of the images, and does not state a license. I reached out to Imparo - both on his talk page and via email - but it has been a week and I have not heard back. These are all high quality photos and I would hate to lose them, but it's really hard to justify keeping them without some more information. The Creative Commons and GFDL licenses require attribution and we don't even know who the copyright holder is that we should be attributing. --B (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Libyan Fragment.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The object is obviously over 100 years old but this picture is clipped from some source (http://realhistoryww.com?) and the photo is certainly less than 100 years old NtheP (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Is that flat enough to count as 2-D art? – Quadell ^(talk) 19:53, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• No. Mike Godwin said one time that even something as flat as a coin should be considered 3D. This is copyrighted. --B (talk) 20:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rats. – Quadell ^(talk) 00:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No indication it's free, and it should be possible to create a free replacement. – Quadell ^(talk) 00:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kendall Schmidt 2013.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I can see no reason to assume that this image is in the public domain. J Milburn (talk) 21:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deena at 2011 MTV Video Music Awards.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• These images are sold to be used royalty-free- I'm fairly sure that they are not public domain. See here. J Milburn (talk) 21:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, not in the least. And their definition of "royalty free" is a stretch. You pay them money and you can print up to a certain number of copies. That's NOT royalty-free - it's just a low royalty. --B (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.