The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicorette Gum man.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Though the source website is no longer available, the uploader quotes it as saying "Creator authorizes release for educational purposes as long as it is accompanied by the following statement ...". "Educational purposes" are not sufficiently free for Wikipedia. B (talk) 03:48, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Extension Dorval - Loop ligne orange.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like a subway map. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clearly that of the Orange Line (Montreal Metro) with a proposed extension. One image without the extension already exists, and it would be nice if we could get a version of the one tagged for deletion that's not under copyright scrutiny. -------User:DanTD (talk) 01:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • The other version isn't free either - it's far too complex for PD-geometry to apply. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • It has two extensions on this map. There's an LRT extension off the end of Blue Line (Montreal Metro) as well, that starts at Lafleur, I assume, according to the arrows, and the configuration of the highway 20. (so extra stations, Lafleur to Snowdon, are Blue Line subway) -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 02:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• {(edit conflict)From what I've found, this does not seem to be a copy of an official map and so the claim it is self made is plausible. It is obviously intended to look like the official map, which on it's own isn't (I don't think) a problem. However, the question is whether it is a derivative work of the official map, either by including part of it or by replicating too closely the design style. As the official map appears to be copyrighted that would make it a ineligible to remain on Wikipedia aiui. Thryduulf (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mere embodiments of facts are not copyrightable. The subway route itself, the proposed route itself, and the location of bodies of water are not copyrightable. But in any event, the map is clearly a photoshop of File:Plan-métro-Dorval.jpg, for which we have OTRS permission to use. So it looks like all we would need to do is fix the source/license. --B (talk) 21:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark at 2010 press conference being interviewed by NY1.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Also on Twitter: https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/2155331368/Screen_Shot_2012-04-22_at_1.20.43_AM.png

Not sure if Twitter has a copy in the same resolution. There is a microphone on the photo which might belong to a TV or radio station, so it might have been taken from a TV broadcast or similar. Stefan2 (talk) 13:40, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:HuntingtonBeach-1904.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source is dead, so it can't be checked. It says that this is in the public domain because it was published before 1923, but it doesn't say when or where it was published, so there is no way to verify this claim. Stefan2 (talk) 13:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I see your harassment of me continues, Stefan2. Considering the period dress, the fact that there are no cars and a plethora of other clues it is clear that this photo was taken well before 1923. But even without that, you never bothered to check and see whether the Los Angeles Public Library had changed their directory. A simple Google and...why there it is and in less time that in took you to create this here's the source. Now why don't you actually add to our body of knowledge rather than following me around? --Bobak (talk) 21:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The link doesn't work:

In either case, you need to show that this was published before 1923, not only taken before 1923. The photo may very well have been taken before 1923, but if it wasn't published at that time, then you have to check for other criteria, for example ((PD-US-unpublished)) if it remained hidden in a drawer until at least 2003.

I'm not sure what you mean with harassment. I was simply checking recent file uploads, and as a new revision of this file was uploaded today, I found the file amongst other recently uploaded files. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scott Vincent.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be a work by WABC TV News. In that case, we need permission from WABC TV News. Stefan2 (talk) 15:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE - The person who uploaded it claims to be his son. -------User:DanTD (talk) 15:50, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it was made by WABC TV News, then the copyright holder is the producing company, not the son of the announcer. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lee Jung Hyun Tokyo Int Film Festival 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears at lot of places on the Internet, so the own work claim is dubious. Check this site for example: http://www.nemopan.com/?mid=panfreetalk&document_srl=6638911 Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vase with decoration of birds and flowers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:COM:ART#Photograph of an old sculpture found on the Internet, or in a book. Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ria van Dyke, wearing Jane Yeh couture, 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 22:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rina Chibani Miss Lebanon 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 22:59, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.