The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom - Empty Pool Hall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no proof that this is "own work" this might be a copy righted photo Redsky89 (talk) 03:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• at http://www.tombreitling.com/bio/multimedia/photo-galleries/tom/ it gives credit to the photographer "Scott Duncan" so unlikely to be the uploader. MilborneOne (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riddickart thumbs 02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unfree file. http://riddickart.com/news/about --Addihockey10 ^e-mail 03:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Legoktm (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo FC Internazionale Milano.svg.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like logo artwork by someone other than the uploader Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:56, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unfree file that already exists as a fair-use SVG here. Malpass⁹₃! (what I've been ^up to/_drop me a ^___) 16:31, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. See notes from the Commons template. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eric Garcetti.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• City of Los Angeles is distinct from the State of California; PD-CAGov doesn't apply. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:25, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The City of Los Angeles is within the boundaries of the State of California; PD-CAGov does geography apply. - DONALDderosa (talk) 20:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • If that logic applied, then PD-USGov would also work. It doesn't though. Cities are not agents of state government, but rather their own independent entities. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:50, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not exactly. The PD-USGov tag is a work of the "United States Federal Government". PD-CAGov is a work of the "State of California", not a work of the "State of California Government". So no, my logic does not apply to your example. The license tag PD-CAGov does not specifically state weather it is in reference to the state government or to the local government. It is a board "State of California" license. - DONALDderosa (talk) 24:59, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • The mayor of Los Angeles is not an employee of the State of California. He works for a separate entity, which may have its own licensing rules. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
          • The ((PD-CAGov)) applies to works "by any state or local agency". A city council in California would seem to be a local agency. As far as I have understood, ((PD-CAGov)) and ((PD-FLGov)) applies to any agency at any level, including city level. On the other hand, ((PD-USGov)) is worded differently and only applies to works made at federal level. Note that the local "PD-CAGov" and "PD-FLGov" use a different wording than the ones on Commons. I'm not sure if this is relevant or whether any of the templates are wrong on either project. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:39, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
            • Actually, if the notes on the Commons template can be trusted, local employees explicitly count in their interpretation as well. I'm withdrawing this nomination. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• He's mayor not a state employee. Eeekster (talk) 21:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Qwyrxian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reina de la salsa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a video capture. Eeekster (talk) 21:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emmanuel A. Gonzalez in PolyU, Hong Kong.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Web resolution. Disputable claim of free license. Sreejith K (talk) 23:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • This picture was taken somewhere between 21 to 22 of August, 2012, in Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. The owner of the camera used and the picture is Emmanuel A. Gonzalez. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmgon (talk • contribs) 07:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.