The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cigarettemachine-joecamel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a vending machine, taken in the United States circa 1990s. Derivative work: large advertisement near center of image (partly obscured by flash). —rybec 19:25, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response: The report does not clearly explain how it is possibly unfree, it just explains what the photo is. It is a photo of a vending machine intended to show what a cigarette machine looks like, which also conveniently shows advertising for Joe Camel so it got onto the Joe Camel page too. If the sourcing is questioned: I took this photo, I released it into the public domain. -- Guroadrunner (talk) 07:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing the photo and for responding here. A derivative work is a creation that includes someone else's creative work. The cigarette company holds the copyright for the advertisement, which is a central part of the composition of your photo. The fact that it can be used as a photo of Joe Camel, not just as a photo of a cigarette machine, is an indication that the copyrighted advertisement may not be de minimis. —rybec 16:00, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glenamaddy turlough.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Should this image be deleted because has been lacking source and author since it upload in 2005. Uploader only made a few edits so we cannot ask them. Moving to commons will certainly mean deletion. ww2censor (talk) 06:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The caption calls it a "sketch" but it looks professionally made. The low resolution and white border make it look like something from a mapping site. —rybec 02:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the low resolution also specifically tends to indicate it came from a website but I could not find one. ww2censor (talk) 05:43, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking closely you can see in the blue/red coloring the print lines from some type of non-laser printer. Clearly not a scan of someone's sketch. Also the text use a computer font for printing. Looks like someone printed and then scanned into computer. Caffeyw (talk) 14:11, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Qwyrxian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CarmenSuleiman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Cropped from image at https://fr-fr.facebook.com/pages/Carmen-Suliman/253033088137625?hc_location=timeline and lacks any real EXIF data. Eeekster (talk) 08:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS has received permissions for this photo from the listed photographer (Massad Mahmoud) via VRTS ticket # 2013080310001552. I've updated the photo with the appropriate license. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Qwyrxian (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CanaaniteRelief.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyright watermarks. Eeekster (talk) 08:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:President Geun-hye.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This was a speedy F9 - I've changed it to a PUF. Image is from http://english.president.go.kr/president/presidents/profile.php - page says at bottom COPYRIGHT 2013-2018 OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT. SOME RIGHTS RESERVED. That would imply some sort of Creative Commons, but I cannot find any page on that site which defines the "Some Rights Reserved" - unless someone knows different?  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:50, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• I've looked, and after not finding anything satisfactorily proving it either way I've e-mailed and asked for clarification. ~Charmlet ^-talk- 20:19, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.