The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bauji Stamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Indian stamps are copyright for 60 years as per discussions noted here and here. As the stamp is dated 1998, the PD tag is clearly incorrect (and PD-self is wrong anyway). —Darkwind (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Logo of Sultan Iskandar Muda International Airport.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo of airport unlikely to be owned by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ile10R.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source or other proof this is PD. The ship was scrapped in 1959. We hope (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleepmakeswaves.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• License is not compatible Eeekster (talk) 03:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as ((db-f3)). --Stefan2 (talk) 12:02, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete - we'll need OTRS permission for this one - the state of Arizona does not release its works into the public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:32, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:P-Arizona K-9 Memorial.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of a modern statue situated in the US. Photograph as such is certainly validly licensed by the uploader, but the artwork depicted is not covered by Freedom of Panorama in the US. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:40, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment-Regardles of the outcome, I just wanted to comment that the statue was funded and donated to the state of Arizona by that state's law enforcement agencies. The statue is located in Wesley Bolin Memorial Plaza whose land is owned by the federal government and is situated across the State Capital Building of Arizona. I believe that as such, it is property of the people of Arizona as all the other memorial in said park. This is just an opinion. Tony the Marine (talk) 17:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ^xplicit 04:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - appears to be crown copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ECWackett1958.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Post-1945 Australian photo. All Australian photos taken in 1946 or later are unfree in the United States, regardless of their copyright status in Australia. Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I've seen this argument succeed at Commons but not at WP -- can you explain how this file survived its deletion request? I can't seem to locate the discussion, perhaps you can... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ^xplicit 04:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

• See similar discussion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Various PD-Australia after 1945. But maybe this is a crown copyright? User:Clindberg suggested that crown copyrights might be exceptions. If not a crown copyright, this is also copyrighted in Australia, since it is post-1954. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Symbol of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I highly doubt that the user actually created this license. Therefore has no right to release it in the public domain. SKATER ^{Is Back} 06:35, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golwalkarguruji.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo not dated: impossible to verify the licence. Stefan2 (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRTC Bus to Nagercoil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From Flickr. Can't find the file information page on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 12:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRTC Bus to Mahe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From Flickr. Can't find the file information page so can't verify the licence. Stefan2 (talk) 12:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PRTC JnNURM Bus II.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From Flickr. File information page not found. Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vickie Van Helsing Book Cover.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Speedy was declined: seems Flickrwashing of a book cover; License is wrongly attributed (CC-BY 3.0 at enwp, at flickr CC-BY 2.0); the official page of the author ( http://www.solomoninkwell.com/landing-page ) says copyrighted and moreover this is an orphaned bok cover with the unlikely chance to get notable/it's own enwp article. mabdul 13:22, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment A licence change from CC-BY-SA 2.0 to CC-BY-SA 3.0 is not a licence violation as you are allowed to increase the version number. The exception is CC-BY-SA 1.0 which can only be licensed as CC-BY-SA 1.0. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhivya Matric Hr Sec School.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gp photo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo appears to be a promotional headshot or back-cover material, not a typical candid shot that would be the work of the uploader. Source is unclear. —Darkwind (talk) 18:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biblekikahaniya.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work (screenshot of TV series). Stefan2 (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - let's assume good faith here; the uploader is apparently elderly, or perhaps s/he is the heir. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ARösch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious status as the uploader's own work as the date given is 1956 and the subject died in 1961. —Darkwind (talk) 19:39, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The uploader probably confused the date. The uploader is no longer active, and I know he seemed like a rather old person who knew many of these people. He used to write about them as though he had spoken to them all. I think the image is genuine and the uploader just confused the date. I would certainly AGF on it. History2007 (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clerc Classic X.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• As a logo, it is neither the uploader's own work nor in the public domain. —Darkwind (talk) 20:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.