The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Tatrinote.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It was reported as possibly unfree here (note that the file has been renamed after that), but it seems that the request later disappeared from the PUF page. I'm questioning whether this map really is own work. Stefan2 (talk) 00:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• This map is published by tourism board of AJK government and authorised us to use it whenever and whereever required. Please stop flagging it again. riz 03:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
  • So we have an admission that it is not pd-self - therefore it must have proof of release from the copyright holder via the WP:OTRS process - please follow the link & have the (c) holder follow the instructions there. Skier Dude (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note The uploader keeps reverting any attempts to add a ((puf)) template to the file information page. Currently, he has reverted ((puf)) additions three times in less than 10 hours. The removing of the ((puf)) template does not mean that this discussion has ended; it is still ongoing and no sufficient proof that the image is free has been presented. Because of WP:3RR, I won't add any ((puf)) template again, though. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mansoor-IJAZ-2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Subject wasn't even alive 100 years ago so the license is obviously bogus. Eeekster (talk) 02:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Versatilesecurity.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no source for logo; if legit, it would not be a "self" license Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 Kcc Cam01 0007.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader doesn't appear to be the copyright holder as claimed by the license tag. Eeekster (talk) 05:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Punahou vs Kahuku 2011.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Small size and exif data imply these were taken from a website. Eeekster (talk) 05:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've changed the classification to Non-free Use Rationale as the pictures WERE taken from a website. However, they were edit by me (cropping and shrinking). The edits did not tarnish the quality of the photos, however, and the owner's intent hasn't be compromised.--Ctoshw (talk) 05:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Obviously unfree and clearly replaceable, thus failing WP:NFCC. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vnjoat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The person on signing something was born in 1923 while the photographer was born in 1978[1]. The person on the picture looks young, so this photo was probably taken before 1978. The uploader has uploaded many other copyvios (see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Kumarrajendran) so this might also be a copyvio. It could be in the public domain because of age, but there is no way to tell without more information. Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vnjpmn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See #File:Vnjoat.jpg above. Stefan2 (talk) 13:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:EmeraldDiamondDVD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious ((PD-self)). Also note that the image has been reduced as a fair use image by User:DASHBot. Stefan2 (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:First Comes Rug Burn Then Comes Fire Bryyn clip.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• According to the file information page, this is fair use under ((Non-free audio sample)). According to the talk page, this is licensed under the "Creative Commons 3.0 licence". The talk page licence specification isn't very specific (CC-BY 3.0 is very different from CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0) and there is no OTRS number listed. How do we handle things like this? Stefan2 (talk) 14:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danny n j3t.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Danny n j3t.png. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamidul hasan muhsin al-hakim.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious ((PD-self)) Stefan2 (talk) 14:56, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PeterUrban.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The text "I received email permission from Julia Urban-Kimberly to use this photo on the Peter Urban article on Wikipedia" sounds insufficient. Stefan2 (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a publicity photo of American GoJu Karate founder Peter Urban. Although I have seen this photo on numerous Karate web sites, this photo came from http://www.americangoju.com/ which is managed by Peter Urban's daughter, Julia Urban-Kimberly. On Feb 8, 2012, I received email permission from Julia Urban-Kimberly to use this photo on the Peter Urban article on Wikipedia. If you wish, I can provide you with a copy of her email. Better yet, I can provide you with her email address then you can verify my email communication with her. (let me know and I'll send it directly to you although it can also be found by poking around the home page of the fore mentioned web site) Neilrieck (talk) 12:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Permission should be sent to OTRS. See instructions at commons:COM:OTRS. Also note that a permission only for use on Wikipedia isn't enough. The image needs to be licensed under a free licence, meaning that most people will be able to use the image for most purposes. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hirosaki Weather Averages.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Might be copyvio from Japan Meteorological Agency. Stefan2 (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hirosaki Windspeed.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Might be copyvio from Japan Meteorological Agency. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mr. Death press photo 2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I can't find this at the source web site and I can't find any source for the Creative Commons statement. Considering the description, F7 might apply. Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thirdhallwgh.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file information page suggests that it might have been copied from [2]. Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the file is not even on the web link i posted that is a picture i have permission to use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fkbowen (talk • contribs) 15:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Globalclassroom.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file information page suggests that it might have been copied from [3]. Stefan2 (talk) 15:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the file is not even on the web link i posted that is a picture i have permission to use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fkbowen (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Globalart.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file information page suggests that it might have been copied from [4]. Stefan2 (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the file is not even on the web link i posted that is a picture i have permission to use — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fkbowen (talk • contribs) 15:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbaspurnew.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Previously deleted (see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 22#File:Abbaspurnew.jpg). At first, the uploader claimed that the image was provided by a friend, but now it has changed to state that the uploader took the picture. This sounds unclear and should be removed per the precautionary principle. The uploader keeps deleting any deletion templates, so I think that this has to be reported as possibly unfree so that someone will notice it. Stefan2 (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The uploader's initial claim should be taken at face value; OTRS proof from the photographer should be required. Skier Dude (talk) 23:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How to send you proof from the friend who authorised to use it?riz 10:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

• Follow the instructions at WP:CONSENT. The e-mail address you should use is permissions-enwikimedia.org. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tatrinote.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Previously deleted (see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 19#File:Tatrinote.jpg). Stefan2 (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Same image, same size, same uploader. No matches found within image searches.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

riz 02:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Stefan2: stop messing around, are you out of your mind, this image was taken by my camera and its my property, so I uploaded it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riztech (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Manuel de la Pila Iglesias from Ponce, Puerto Rico.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Painting of unknown provenance, certainly not the work of the Flickr user to whose account it is currently sourced. Might conceivably be PD, but needs proper attribution to original painter. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP: To the best of my knowledge the painter himself is unknown and this is why the pic has a Flickr author name but not the painter's. My suggestion is the license be changed to a Fair Use since the man is dead and no original photo can possibly be created. In fact I'll go ahead and change the license since its a painting and not just a photo of a living person. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 19:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

Changed license HERE to non-free with rationale. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• I think that fair use might be appropriate here. The person has been dead for a long time and unless anyone knows of any other picture of him, this might be the only image we can use. Since he died more than 60 years ago, the painting could easily be PD (e.g. published before 1923, published without a copyright notice or published without renewing the copyright), but there is no way to tell. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sukhothai main stand.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo from [5]. No indication uploader is the same person as the uploader on that site. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ISS011 Upheaval Dome.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Without source, there is "iss011ed7428" on the bottom of image, probably id, but I was unable to find anything using it. Bulwersator (talk) 22:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• It is an obvious NASA image. Quick search shows up this link.-- — JyriL ^talk 07:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Moved, can be deleted as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 09:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TrevorKidGuitar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claimed to be CC-BY-SA from http://www.trevorrabin.net but the source clearly says "All rights reserved. Unauthorized use of all or part of this site is expressly prohibited. Also, uploader has had previous problems with images. Thuresson (talk) 22:35, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WGHchemlab.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file information page suggests that it might have been copied from [6]. Stefan2 (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• http://www.huckabee-inc.com/images/gallery_k12/image_gallery_waxahachie_03.jpg Science Lab, PHOTO © Paul Chaplo  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 02:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Globalcommons.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file information page suggests that it might have been copied from [7]. Stefan2 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Globalcafeteria.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file information page suggests that it might have been copied from [8]. Stefan2 (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.