The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Chick Bowen (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newtown Station.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It appears that this image was taken from here. A reverse Google image search, restricting the date range to one before the upload date here on Wikipedia, indicates that the webpage has existed since February 28, 2003. — ξ^xplicit 05:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crystal and Gunderson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No indication at the source that the file has been released into the public domain as the license template implies. — Yerpo ^Eh? 09:12, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Animal Actors.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image comes from Flickr where it has a non-commercial license. I would be inclined to assume that the user here might be the Flickr user if they hadn't also uploaded two copyright violating images from USA Today. User gives every appearance of being a paid editor for animal training company. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mafiya tattoos.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unfree. A combined work from the Russian Criminal Tattoo Encyclopedia as noted here and scanned in other places.[1] [2] Was discovered in this ANI topic. [3] ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not only unfree, but uploader lied about its provenance. Unfortunately it's a useful image. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is useful, but I ask the question, are we not obligated to take action against it now? The deception is uncovered and the attribution found, could the real source qualify under non-free content? That may be a separate matter, but Wikipedia's legal team would be concerned if this file is not deleted under these circumstances. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• convert to fairuse and correct the description -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 05:07, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human transmutation circle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description says, that it's the work of Hiromu Arakawa. Thus likely the uploader.has no rights to release it under a free license. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.