The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Homedepotexpo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• An aerial photo of one 2,242 Home Depot locations can hardly qualify as fair use, especially when the article already has several free-license photos of the stores. --Fyre2387 ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:08, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winston Choo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low-resolution unfree image (Singapore National Archives) of a living person made less than 70 years ago, not possibly PD-self. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs • Editor review) 01:48, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alejandro Alcondez Cielito Lindo Beautiful Heaven Movie Premiere Graumans Chinese Theater 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Alejandroalcondezcielitolindo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:AlejandroAlcondez.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Alejandro Alcondez Premiere Graumans Chinese TheaterBW.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

• Some of these have already been deleted from Wikimedia Commons. The problem is that they are all from an unknown photographer and came from the subjects website. Yes they have a "free" license but that may not be fully correct due to lack of author and true source. Without an OTRS these should go. See also Media copyright questions where I first was made aware of these. Also note they were upped by a user who has made claims outside of Wikipedia they are an "Administrative Assistance At Alejandro Alcondez Pictures". See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Alcondez, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Alcondez (2nd nomination) and COI noticeboard. Soundvisions1 (talk) 06:32, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rc02968.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:OverseaRailwayBridge.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.