The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medal of Courage Medal.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploader's files have been previously deleted both in WP and in Commons Blacklake (talk) 11:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medal of Distinguished Service Medal.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploader's files have been previously deleted both in WP and in Commons Blacklake (talk) 12:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Operational Service Medal for Afghanistan.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low resolution, missing EXIF, uploader's files have been previously deleted both in WP and in Commons Blacklake (talk) 12:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega94.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is tagged as being a self-created file licensed under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and the GFDL. However, the uploader's own words on the file description page seem to indicate that he believes he retains full control over the image ("authorized to be used by Dortega," "Noone has the right to erase the picture without my authorization"; in previous versions, "I do not allow anyone to delete my picture or edit it" and "This is protected by me"). I also received a note on my talk page from the uploader in which he said, "You have no right to just erase someone's picture without asking for permission." It is not clear that the uploader has really understood and agreed to the terms of the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and the GFDL, which allow anyone to use, redistribute, or modify the image in any way and for any purpose, without asking further permission from him to do so. See also Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 January 15#File:La Paz Skyline By Dortega.jpg. —Bkell (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Notwithstanding the licence ambiguity, the low resolution and overall composition make this look like a professional montage for a website or somesuch. Including the seal of the central bank seems a particular giveaway. Boissière (talk) 22:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girlsaloudsunsilk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I highly doubt the "public domain" origins of this image. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 21:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girlsaloud2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader says he created these files, yet the summary states the source as "Zimbo". I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 21:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:1006 milkis lotte.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:1006 milkis lotte.jpg. Fair use may apply, if they don't just blot out the image on commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regardless of what happens, I have a Milkis in my refridgerator and I can take a new picture. But first you guys reach an agreement on whether or not taking a picture of a bottle is copyvio, or on how small the picture needs to be to not be copyvio, so that I can make sure to take it the right way. (And do it quickly because I want to drink it!) rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I took the picture in my own kitchen and uploaded it, don't understand why fair use is being disputed? Nuyos (talk) 10:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:WorldMensCurlingMonctonFlags.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The photo is a derivative work of the flags. So I doubt this is free. MGA73 (talk) 22:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.