The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dsc04034.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the author of this file. Leyo 09:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dsc04046.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I doubt that the uploader is the author of this file. Leyo 09:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dscf0078.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Licensing in doubt. Leyo 09:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aimpoo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unused screenshot of computer software. Claimed under pd-self. Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LTTE Controlled Areas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused map. Claimed as pd-self Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aishwarya01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused scan of an autographed promo photo. Uploader claims pd-self. Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ck with ajay data.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused personal photo. Uploader is one of the subjects in the photo, doubtful they "created this work entirely by myself". Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:28, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Untitled3copytm9.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• To be honest, I'm not 100% sure of this one. However, this is obviously an adjusted image of the ECHL logo. I'm not sure if this kind of alteration allows for a new copyright. I thought it would be best to list this here and let others who know more about it chime in. Additionally, this image is unused. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 13:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al udall.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unuised image. Could be a promo photo. Uploader created an account and upped this. Soundvisions1 (talk) 13:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ProjectAiko2007B.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't think the up loader is actual copyright holder. This image appears at http://www.bukisa.com/articles/252871_robot-sex-slaves-are-no-longer-science-fiction and I would suspect came from the company page here that I cannot access. However, that doesn’t change the fact that I doubt this up loader holds the copyright since the website claims © Copyright 2008 - 2010 Webika Ltd. All Rights Reserved. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 13:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Payman Modarres.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a scan of an autographed promo photo. Uploader claims pd-self. I doubt user is copyright holder. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 13:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Legendcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused album cover Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alaskaart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unused album cover Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Comrie Golf Club.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is stated as "Google maps", which is not a free image source. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 14:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bonnybridge Golf Club.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is stated as "Google maps", which is not a free image source. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 14:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toronto at Night.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused image - claimed as pd-self however users other uploads vary in quality and source. See File:Oneilbanner.jpg (Could be taken by uploader), File:Fanmeetsmel.jpg (uploader is in picture) and File:TorontoMontage6FrameInfoBox.png (Sourced to Wikimedia Commons). Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Album cover 1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused album cover Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lingayats.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• user has a history of copyvios, this is a collage, no source provided for individual images —SpacemanSpiff 16:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sludge-dinobots.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:10 custom gold units.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photographing or scanning an image dose not create a copyright or license, so this image cannot be ((PD-self)) as listed. If anything it need to be ((non-free currency)) with appropriate ((Non-free use rationale)). However, even if this is done, it would become a orphaned fair use image and would have to be deleted anyway --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 16:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Insufficient source information to verify that the image is under the public domain. — ξ^xplicit 22:37, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Armenian Fedayi Keri.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is not a ((PD-self)) image as taged. Arshak Gafavian was not a foot soldier until 1904 during the Sasun Resistance (1904), that page that this image appear. No where does the upoader show that this image is from he 1890's (as claimed), so it may be incorrect. Even assuming it is correct, according to the Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States, "unpublished anonymous and pseudonymous works" are copyrighted "120 years from date of creation" or pre 1980. Since this image was taken less then 120 years ago, unless this image was published prior to 1923 (((PD-US))) or the author died more than 100 years ago (currently in 1909 or earlier) (((PD-old))), then this image is not Public Domain. None of this need information is supplied by uploader user:ArmenianHistoryX.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 17:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Not the best of sources, to be sure, but we can apparently figure out the (or a) source of this picture based on this ebay listing: it was a work published in 1916 in St Petersburg. Unless you see any reason to doubt this logic, tag all of the images of Gafavian ((PD-US-1923-abroad)) and ((PD-RusEmpire)). Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't see that image on that ebay page. Can you explain your reasoning? Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree. I also don't see the image, but I may just be missing it since the imagve here was cropped from some other image. I agree that it may be PD, but the uploader has failed to suppy the correct infomration to show it is. If it is in the book, then yes ((PD-US-1923-abroad)) and {tl|PD-RusEmpire)) applie.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 11:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arpad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Arpad 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• First, these poorly sources images are exact duplicates of each other File:Arpad.jpg, File:Arpad 2008.jpg, and File:Arpad album photosession.jpg. Second, both Arpad.kollanyi (here and here), and Platformshoes (here) both claim to hold the copyrights. Lastly this appears to be a publicity photo, so I doubt ether Arpad.kollanyi or Platformshoes own copyright. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 17:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note File:Arpad 2008.jpg has been delted as dulicate.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 12:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AYalla.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Aldopic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

• Unused - looks to be an album cover or promo shot. File:Aldopic.jpg is a derivative of this from the same user but being used. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:0905 web johnreames.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is poorly sourced. No date is give, and there is no evidence that uploader created the image as stated. I would suspect it is a publicity photo, meaning it isn't ((pd-self)) as tagged. Additionally, I would also suspect that it was a copy of the image that was deleted previously, that was on the John Reames page, here--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 17:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boris order of ontario.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This appears to be a professional publicity photo. I doubt uploaded hold copyright or took photo at all.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 18:09, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boruca Mask.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a photograph of artwork. This dose not releases the copyright of the artwork maker. At minimum it falls under ((Non-free 3D art)), so it is missing Fair use information--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 18:14, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• commons:COM:FOP tells us that Costa Rica is an unusual case. There is full freedom of panorama for both 2- and 3-d state-owned objects, both outdoors and in museums, and none under other circumstances. If we could be sure that this mask was in a museum this image would be free. As we aren't, and won't be unless the uploader tells us that it was, it will have to go. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:32, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tombstone pizza.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlicensed derivative of copyrighted package artwork/design. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 18:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo myself. Using your logic, we'd have to start deleting any representation of Coca-cola logos. --Ichabod (talk) 00:49, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• It may well include trademarked material, and should be tagged with ((trademark)), but it probably isn't art of any sort, applied or otherwise, so it is improbable that this could be protected by US copyright legislation. See commons:Commons:Derivative works#Isn't every product copyrighted by someone? What about cars? Or kitchen chairs? My computer case?. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:38, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MariusBunescu.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I see no reason this public domain, nor why PD-old-50 is applied. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malachimartin photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see above nomination. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucia dos Santos.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see above nomination Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evonnemb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is watermarked by photographer. It appears to be a proof for a school photo. The up loader is probably not the copyright holder in this case.. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 18:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tu santidad me envuelve.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Tod lo que respira.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Joyful noise.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:De regreso a casa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Cicatrices de amor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Caintico de libertad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

• All unused CD covers. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FDM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This appears to be a publicity photo for the group FDM. As such it cannot be ((pd-self)).--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 18:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter F Vallone headshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Released as pd-self but Metadata credits the author as William Alatriste a professional photographer so unlikely to be the work of the uploader MilborneOne (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JamesHaylett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photographing artwork doesn’t release copyright.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 18:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Near-duplicate at File:JimmyHaylett.jpg. This seems to be posthumous portrait by a local artist, not one from life. If a case was going to be made for a non-free image it would seem better for us, and easier to justify, if we were to use one of the surviving contemporary photographs of Haylett, perhas with his crew, such as the ones here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monaco coin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photographing a coin doesn’t not release the copyright of that coin. This is probably ((Non-free currency)). --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Original Shell Game.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Phone Home Game.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Original Lucky Seven.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Classic Secret X.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Penny Ante.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Original Shopping Spree Scoreboard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Split Decision.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:TPIR Walk Of Fame.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:On The Nose.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• These are all copyrighted TV show clips --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The file may very well have a fair use rationale, but it doesn't change the fact that it's licensed under ((cc-by-sa-3.0)). As these covers are obviously not released under such a license, they do contain non-free elements. — ξ^xplicit 00:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nintendogs first 6.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image contains box art of the Nintendogs games, which are copyrighted. Acather96 (talk) 19:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The thumbnail images contained in the key to the Venn diagram are allowable under the rationale for use of non-free images. Please see the image page where information and rationale have been edited to reflect this. Struhs (talk) 20:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete the Denny's logo. It's orphaned anyways, and the official logo is being used in the article. There's no point is needlessly keep a derivative around, nor is there a point to bureaucratically relist it at WP:FFD. Keep the Perkins logo and marked it with ((PD-text)). — ξ^xplicit 00:47, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Denny's.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Perkins Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Recreating a logo doesn’t mean you are now the copyright holder, only that you’re good at remaking copyrighted images. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• True enough, but for the Denny's logo, that's just text and geometric shape, so quite plausibly ((pd-textlogo)). Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PrioryParkPoster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a photgraph of a copyrighted poster. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puerto vallarta 1969.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This appears to come from Cascade industries inc. not a ((pd-self)) image. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 19:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SQUAREOFF retouched 78.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This appears to be a promotional photo for a rap group. As such I doubt uploader has the right to release the copyright. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:32, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Karas the Anchorite.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It is very hard to tell, due to size, but this appears to have an artist signature, making it Non-free art. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanotas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is nothing here to show that the author (photo taker) died more than 100 years ago ((PD-old)), that for images published in the U.S. before 1923 ((PD-US)), or that uploader has the right to release the copyright.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DH logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/contact.php shows clearly CC-BY-SA-NON Commercial licensing. Masur (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WausauHomes logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Description says it the "Wausau Homes Corporate Logo", therefor it is un-free. --ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yet Another SecuROM Utility.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Says it's a "Captured" Windows clipping, making is no-free software screen shot.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 20:59, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlexHooserLB2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:MorganSLB2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:CedricLB2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:DieterLB2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

• These are tiny and unused, but I suspect they are all copyvios because they are all Laguna Beach Cast members and all have "LB" in their names. (And in looking over the user uploads every image has been of LB and has been deleted. These seem to be the only ones left) Soundvisions1 (talk) 22:02, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• The first and third have red eye. Of course, just because something is not professional doesn't mean that it was the uploader's own work.Anyway, we're well past the point where we stop assuming the uploader either knows or cares about copyright. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:10, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment': Huh? "The first and third have red eye"? "just because something is not professional doesn't mean that it was the uploader's own work"? I can't tell if you are being ironic or are serious. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• We should delete these because of the uploader's record. If it had been someone else had uploaded them I might have believed they were their own work. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:58, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.