The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mexico city earthquake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Photo credit: Reinsurance Company, Munich, Germany" is incompatible with the claim that this image is a work of NOAA. TheGrappler (talk) 01:21, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanos S608.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• sourced to autobusi.net, which at the bottom of [1] states (c)... 2010. No indication image was released into PD by them. Skier Dude (talk 02:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sanos S213.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• sourced to autobusi.net, which at the bottom of [2] states (c)... 2010. No indication image was released into PD by them. Skier Dude (talk 02:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:24, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaifetz Arena 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a publicity photo for the arena. Can be found on the arena's official Facebook profile and website. Mosmof (talk) 03:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Islam problem israel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Book cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk 04:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:02, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pele2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Complaint at Ticket:2010092010003692 that this is non-free. Listing here to prevent moving to Commons or further reuse until we get clarification. Stifle (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PaulKemsley.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Other files uploaded by this user have turned out to be copyvios; all are professional-looking portraits uploaded at web resolution with a PD-self tag. This must therefore throw this image into suspicion. Stifle (talk) 10:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• This doesn't prove ownership either way, but a more heavily cropped version appears at http://www.nycosmos.com/about/ along with a similarly-cropped version of Terry Byrne (to whom the uploader appears to be connected). - Fayenatic (talk) 17:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TedChronopoulos.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Other files uploaded by this user have turned out to be copyvios; all are professional-looking portraits uploaded at web resolution with a PD-self tag. This must therefore throw this image into suspicion. Stifle (talk) 10:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• This doesn't prove ownership either way, but a cropped BW version of this colour image appears at http://www.nycosmos.com/about/ along with a cropped BW version of Terry Byrne's photo (to whom the uploader of both appears to be connected). - Fayenatic (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Savarese vt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Other files uploaded by this user have turned out to be copyvios; all are professional-looking portraits uploaded at web resolution with a PD-self tag. This must therefore throw this image into suspicion. Stifle (talk) 10:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• This doesn't prove ownership either way, but a BW version of this colour image appears at http://www.nycosmos.com/about/ along with a cropped BW version of Terry Byrne's photo (to whom the uploader of both appears to be connected). - Fayenatic (talk) 17:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 00:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adam Winfield, charged with premeditated murder at FOB Ramrod, Kandahar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems like a very weak claim of public domain to me. There is nothing to say the picture was taken as official work. Its like a weak secondary claim of public domain, to be clear we should cite this to its original source, I also note that the same picture was originally uploaded as a fair use pic. Off2riorob (talk) 12:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- The Washington Post explicitly credits the image to "US Army". Yes, I initially uploaded a lower resolution version of this image, one that was published without listing a credit. Many publications -- even otherwise highly respected publications, don't bother to list a credit for public domain images. In this particular instance, when I saw that the Washington Post had used a higher resolutin version of the image, which they explicitly attributed to the US Army, I felt it was appropriate to change the liscensing on the image from fair use to public domain. I am going to assume that this nomination is due to an overly hasty nominator not noticing a credit in grey type on a black background. Geo Swan (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- This and other similar images of the soldiers accused in this incident have widely-published in reputable news sources, invariably with the photo credit "US Army"[3][4] or "Public Domain".[5] If they're all satisfied, I see no reason we shouldn't be. The original tagging as non-free appears to have been a simple error. -- Rrburke (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adolfo Sansolini.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused image - unsure if uploader is the photographer or if they are the subject of the image as they also created the Adolfo Sansolini article which was deleted. (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolfo Sansolini). Soundvisions1 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Derivative work as per nominator and unlikely to be suitable for ((non-free logo)) in this context. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerocontinente2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a derivative work of a logo, Summary says "done in photo shop", but the logo and it's text are direct from the logo of the airline. (Aero Continente) Soundvisions1 (talk) 19:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evoluzione.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused image. This was a spam image page set up to look like a mainspace article. (see How it used to look). Uploaders other images have been copyvios, this is likely to be one as well. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

All deleted. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stven Tyler in 1988.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Steven tyleghunjnjfgnh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Mmilup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Concert Circa75 10006-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Tylers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Photo RobertKnight2 10001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Tyler1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Tyler biog.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Aerosmith593.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Scan246ghjuiyio.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Yhjjhj.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Big Photo Aerosmith 007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:AerosmithStevenTyler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:CalJam003´787.gif (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Even Cere VH1Fash 10023.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Scan105hg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

• Uploader has already been blocked for copyvios in the past. These images all appear to be copyvios as well but it will take a while to find actual sources so I am sending them here first. If anyone finds the sources feel free to re-tag as speedys. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• • Uploader now started to upload copyvios to Commons. Non of the uploads listed above is created entirely by himself as claimed. Delete. --Martin H. (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gator.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 21:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mickey Gilley Picture 1494.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo 18A 150.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused album cover. Soundvisions1 (talk) 21:57, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afterworld 150 X 150.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unused image of an album cover Soundvisions1 (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AVI Ext icon.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is tagged as "My Own Creation" which is obviously untrue: It has embedded a part of the non-free copyright-protected AVI icon (Seen in Windows 7) by Microsoft corporation. Formerly tagged as being available under a Creative Commons license which was also an invalid claim. (See description page history.) Fleet Command (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.