The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zg logo(white).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claimed as self but clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PasReform.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Self claim but clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CM logo index.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Self-claim but clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karamsarlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Self claim - but clearly logo Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Files can be unlisted immediately if they are indisputably in the public domain. -- Zsero (talk) 14:04, 6 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

File:Prees-branch.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• NC claim - but given the source this is clearly on out of copyright OS map Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. As the page mentions, the maps date until 1945. As such, this is clearly expired Crown copyright per ((PD-BritishGov)). IronGargoyle (talk) 13:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As far as I can find out the map is "Wrexham and Oswestry, England and Wales Popular (4th) edition. Published in 1921."  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:49, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep I don't understand why this was listed in the first place. It's very clearly marked "Out of copyright Ordnance Survey maps", and I don't see anyone contradicting that description, so what's the problem? -- Zsero (talk) 07:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was reffered here because of a claim of CC-NC in the Permission field. 'NC=Non Commerical' which is incompatible with Wikipedia,

and conflicts with the file being PD. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is that all? The NC is obviously spurious, so why not just change it? Why even contemplate deleting the photo instead?! I've changed the tag to PD-BritishGov, and am now closing this discussion. -- Zsero (talk) 13:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution offered. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Startherelogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• GFDL claim but it's a logo - pdtextlogo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Absolutely a case of ((PD-textlogo)). IronGargoyle (talk) 22:46, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Squirt.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Product artwork - so should be non-free use ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• ok Donmike10 (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Jose Stadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photoshop involving what appears to be a professionally released photo. Thus, this is probably a derivative of a copyrighted work. User also has a history of misunderstanding copyright in an attempt to use Wikipedia as a webhosting service for a made-up game of some sort; even if not unfree, this is a useless file and should be deleted here or at FFD. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:04, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn and retagged. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:STACKED LOGO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sure that TBARTA is an agency of the US Federal Government. Image may almost certainly be used under our non-free content guidelines, but I believe the current tag is incorrect. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is not a work of the U.S. Federal Government, but this does seem to fall under the the purview of ((PD-FLGov)). IronGargoyle (talk) 22:44, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quite right. Sometimes I need to take more than a few seconds to look things over. Withdrawn and retagged. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.