The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tuns 2010.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tineye search finds a higher-resolution image sourced to a Myspace page. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nam Dan Plaza render.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image has been copied from http://www.pvpowerland.vn/default.aspx?pid=19&cid=1, and there's no evidence that this user created it. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:34, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMO Lamson Render.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image has been copied from http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=46583631, and there's no evidence that this user created the image. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:36, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saigonpearl render.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image has been copied from http://saigonpearl.wordpress.com/2008/05/28/c%E1%BA%A7n-ban-chcc-saigon-pearl-topaz-2-t%E1%BA%A7ng-30-can-g%E1%BB%91c-view-song-gia-2700m2/, and there's no evidence that this user created the image. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TAX Plaza render.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user's other uploads indicate an incomplete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ben thanh twin tower render by arept.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user doesn't seem to have a complete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doanh nhan tower HN render.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user doesn't seem to have a complete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lotte Tower render.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user doesn't seem to have a complete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EVN tower render.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user doesn't seem to have a complete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viendong Meridian render.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user doesn't seem to have a complete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sjc render.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user doesn't seem to have a complete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vietcombank by Ceasar Peli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional rendering; user doesn't seem to have a complete understanding of copyright. (ESkog)^(Talk) 14:48, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1964 European Cup Winners Cup Final Sporting -MTK (3-3 1-0).flv.OGG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This file has a watermark of a website in the corner (I cannot read it though), and has come from a problematic author. The video is so small that I do not think it serves a purpose in the article. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:44, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nerm-big-31-43.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Based on the quality and pose of this image, I find it hard to believe that it is public domain. I think that it should be looked into or removed. Zell Faze (talk) 00:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC) To add to this, this user has a history of uploading unfree files and creating articles that have been nominated for speedy deletion. Zell Faze (talk) 00:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sidenerm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Based on the quality and pose of this image, I find it hard to believe that it is public domain. I think that it should be looked into or removed. Zell Faze (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC) To add to this, this user has a history of uploading unfree files and creating articles that have been nominated for speedy deletion. Zell Faze (talk) 00:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.