The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paulfhenderson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence of release under the license CC-BY-SA-3.0. Evidence should be linked or forwarded to OTRS. Rettetast (talk) 06:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Image was supplied by daughter of Paul Henderson from the family pictures. Permission to put it on wiki was given by skype communication as included in description page.NED33 (talk) 10:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But where does it say that she releases it under the free license CC-BY-SA-3.0 which means that anyone can use the image for whatever purpose? Rettetast (talk) 11:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked Martha today the following question. I'm waiting for a reply.

Hi Martha,

As I suspected, Wikipedia is very strict on copyright with images. From our Skype conversation it was not clear for them if you gave permission for CC-BY-SA-3.0 what means:

• Licensees may copy, distribute, display and perform the work and make derivative works based on it only if they give the author or licensor the credits in the manner specified by these. (BY) and,
• Licensees may distribute derivative works only under a license identical to the license that governs the original work (SA)

Is it possible for you to give this CC-BY-SA-3.0 permission to the wiki guys? [18:04:22] Rudy den Outer: This for the file Paulfhenderson.jpg? NED33 (talk) 16:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[21:40:58] Martha Henderson: Yes - how do I do this? [21:42:43] Rudy den Outer: Thanks. Can you write me a email confirming above licence for above filename? [21:44:34] Martha Henderson: I have just sent you an email. [21:44:40] Martha Henderson: Hope this works. [21:44:46] Rudy den Outer: Perfect

• Keep, I have the email permission. What do I do next?NED33 (talk) 19:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vijay in black bmw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probable copyvio. Newly uploaded, but already hits on Tineye. J Milburn (talk) 11:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashjian-Scott.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not a work of the Untied States Federal Government. Lacking info on who the author was, and what the initial copyright was. -- Cirt (talk) 16:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• It's a free file, I wasn't sure hot to tag it. File source, as cited with the upload, is website of the Nevada Secretary of State:

http://nvsos.gov/index.aspx?page=337

Ashjian is a current candidate for office in the state, the file was supplied to the Secretary of State's office by his campaign and is now part of the public record.

Sorry about the wrong tag. Carrite (talk) 02:38, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:23, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IM001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• May scrape under the wire on ((pd-font)), but it appears to be a trademark or logo of Iron Maiden and therefore requires a fair-use rationale. Rodhullandemu 21:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.