The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:For personal non-commercial use.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Name of file seems incompatible with a free licence, and there is no evidence of authorship, merely possession, which does not satisfy copyright requirements. Rodhullandemu 00:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Do Not Enter Traffic light.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image claims Google as the copyright owner. Eeekster (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I was going to speedy delete this as invalid license, but since you think it is possibly free I will leave till the discussion is over! How about we have an essay at WP:Google Earth or WP:Google Maps which says that we delete these on site due to incompatible license. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader claimed he created the image himself. I sent it here because I didn't really believe him but thought I might be overlooking something. Speedy makes sense to me if that's what you want. 04:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Newbies will have trouble finding the correct license and source to include, so they pick made it myslef, when they pressed print and saved the picture. Even if the uploader really put the image together, the Google logo is not free and so can make the whole image unfree. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file tagged as non-free. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Fast and the Furious (1955 film).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Can't have been published before 1923, the movie is from 1955. Eeekster (talk) 04:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Fair-use rationale has now been added by the uploader. Keep. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arandjelovac coat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader, who has a history of creating copyright violations, claims the image has been released under a free license. I find this very unlikely. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opanci.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader, who has a history of creating copyright violations, claims they created the image. I find this very unlikely. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SNS2.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned. Probably a copyvio. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serb Clans1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader, who has a history of creating copyright violations, claims they created the image. I find this very unlikely. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Momcilo Perisic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader hasn't provided any evidence that the image has been released into the public domain. This link suggests that the image belongs to the Associated Press. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonja Kolacaric.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There's no evidence that this image has been released into the public domain. Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:14, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Topcider.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There's no evidence that the image has been released under a free license. Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Z2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploader is unlikely to own the rights to this poster. Eeekster (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I reverted this image to an earlier version just as you were nominating it for deletion. So just to avoid confusion, can you confirm which version you are suggesting is unfree? -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ofm team.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like part of a screen capture. Eeekster (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.