The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image appears to be cut and paste from http://www.hydroponicist.com/ which in turn is copied from a book under copyright (ISBN 0955011205). Ash (talk) 06:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The footnote on the caption of this image at Ganesha says,
Does this imply the image is copied from the book? The original sculpture is from the 5th century; so it is PD. Does anyone know about freedom of panorama in Afganistan? Afganistan is not listed at Commons:Commons:FOP. —teb728 t c 08:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files. Stifle (talk) 10:33, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept w/ license & Fur corrected.Skier Dude (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This may be PD due to age, but the license given is almost certainly wrong and the uploader has uploaded a pile of images under the same license, some of which are clearly copyrighted, bringing this one into doubt. Stifle (talk) 10:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept w/License & FuR updated. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: kept w/license & FuR updated. Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This image may be PD due to age, but is almost certainly not CC-BY-SA or GFDL. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think these banknotes are CC-BY-SA... Stifle (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader possesses sufficient rights to release these images. Stifle (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader may (or may not) have taken the photograph, but the coin design is still copyrighted. Stifle (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. An Arabic-speaker is requested to interpret the comment added beneath the license tag on the file page. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Furthermore, the status of freedom of panorama in Iran is questionable. Stifle (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder, given his history of uploading non-free files and claiming to have created them himself. Stifle (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:55, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Given this uploader's history it is very likely that this image was just grabbed from some website. Stifle (talk) 10:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No metadata, user is probably copying images from news websites if you look at their other uploads. —SpaceFlight89 11:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder, given his upload history Stifle (talk) 13:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Web-resolution image; given uploader's history it is probably taken from a random website. Stifle (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image has been tagged as cc-by-3.0, but on flickr, is licensed as "All Rights Reserved" which is not a free license. Info template also said "Thanks to So Cal Metro for providing the image." but flickr notice contradicts any implied permission. --Optigan13 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Optigan13 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suspect this was not created by the user, it's low resolution without metadata, there is a watermark in the upper corner. Also bigger versions (without the watermark) can be readlity found online[2][3] Sherool (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Out of scope. Stifle (talk) 13:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fair-use images that are used to illustrate are not considered appropriate on Wikipedia. It does not identify or provide critical commentary on the station ID, program, or contents. It serves only as a picture of the characters.
The uploader has repeatedly contested this, so rather than edit-war over the di tag, I have brought it to FfD for discussion. Irbisgreif (talk) 20:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I I am confused as to why this was placed in PUF previously. I must have hit the wrong button when tagging it. Mea culpa. I have moved the discussion to FfD, where it was meant to go. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:35, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per flickr All Rights Reserved. See image description page for links Optigan13 (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Per flickr, image is All Rights Reserved Optigan13 (talk) 21:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]