The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Description = "official promotional image" / source = "self made" but the sourced website does not appear to have CC compatible release Skier Dude (talk) 06:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note above - this is just a cropped version of the other image that removed the web link Skier Dude (talk) 06:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kept - After some reviewing it seems most likely that this image is correctly licenced. It would help though If Mr Reinecke would separately confirm that he, and Pascalre, are the same person. I see that a note to this effect has been left for Pascalre. - Peripitus (Talk) 02:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC) Image also located here. I suspect this image has been taken from elsewhere- it certainly looks like a press shot. J Milburn (talk) 15:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have made this photo by myself - Ralf Reinecke - I am the photographer. I work as freelancer, cause I make a lot of photos, I think I can support wikipedia sometimes with photos —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pascalre (talk • contribs) 15:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Tagged as non-free (it's currently pending deletion for beeing unused). --Sherool (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be too complicated to me for PD-textlogo. The letters are all stylized; is there really a font that looks like that? –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd agree, tag nonfree and delete if its use cannot be justified in an article. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • It doesn't look like it can. Unless someone is willing to write a rationale for this, I'd just let it burn. If they are willing to write a rationale, they should be ready to be challenged... J Milburn (talk) 23:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.