The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 02:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
it's an old logo the college isn't using any more. FWIW, I am also no longer associated with the college, but I would say, safe to delete. UnkleFester (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Infrogmation (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder, superseded by .png Skier Dude (talk) 03:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:37, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:45, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Screenshot of television broadcast program. Radiant chains (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, apparent derivative -if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, if legit logo uploader would most likely not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tabercil (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt covers of Rolling Stone magazine have been released into the public domain. J Milburn (talk) 11:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC) There are no doubts, that Rolling Stone released this picture to the public domain. What do you think about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Britneyspearsrollingstone.jpg Why Shakira is not too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Borkan85 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free artwork, no FOP in France ViperSnake151 Talk 14:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
appears to be professional headshot, given uploader's history I don't believe he is the (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Low resolution, exact copy of a file already uploaded (now deleted) which had no licensing information. No meta-data. I suspect this image has been taken from elsewhere without permission. J Milburn (talk) 17:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader dubiously claims to be copyright holder. Photographer's mark ("Bickerwood & Bickerwood"? Can't quite read first letters). No evidence presented that photo is free licensed for any other reason. Infrogmation (talk) 17:52, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uploader not copyright holder of painting. Image is orphan. Infrogmation (talk) 17:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This image consists solely of a picture taken of a copyrighted work, and so I do not believe that it can be in the public domain. –Drilnoth (T • C) 19:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This image consists almost entirely of a picture of a presumably copyrighted work, and therefore I do not believe that it can be in the public domain. –Drilnoth (T • C) 19:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be an image of a copyrighted program, so it can't be public domain. Unused. –Drilnoth (T • C) 21:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Has a copyright symbol in description, so it can't be in the public domain. No evidence of permission from artist, although the uploader may be the same person. Unused. –Drilnoth (T • C) 21:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader stated only "Rioux Photography" on this mountain photo. There was no tag, but this was back in 2005, before tags were in wide use. A user later tagged this GFDL-presumed, but I don't see a reason to believe the uploader created this. – Quadell (talk) 21:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This photo of a car was uploaded back in 2005 without a tag, but tags weren't in wide use at the time. If the uploader was the creator of this photo, then it's GFDL by virtue of the disclaimer that was on the upload page at the time. But was the uploader the creator? Sable232 tagged it as GFDL-presumed and said "This user been inactive for a very long time. Judging from the picture and the data, I believe that this image was created by the uploader." I'm not convinced. – Quadell (talk) 21:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]