The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find any statement of GFDL release at the source website. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 00:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am the person who uploaded this picture. I found this picture on photo bucket, and some rights are reserved that you cannot sell or distribute the picture. I do not know the exact copyrights but I am aloud to post this. Plus I gave info about the picture and say it is NOT my picture. User Gretzkyv99

Wikipedia's GFDL allows for commercial sale of the work, so unless the photo's owner changes the license, we can't use it here. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nv8200p (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"I own it. Wikipedia may use it." sounds a lot more like ((db-i3)) than ((PD-self)). The licensing information needs to be clarified. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 00:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does, but he's the one that slapped the ((PD-self)). It irrevocably the public's now. Rocket000 (talk) 21:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

 – correct template applied. SkierRMH (talk) 04:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensed as CC-BY-SA 3.0 but also claims to be copyrighted. Mr.Z-man 02:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, technically anything that's not Public Domain is copyrighted. But 1970? That's a little old for copyleft, unless it was relicensed. Rocket000 (talk) 21:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've placed it with an unsourced tag. The Evil Spartan (talk) 01:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Maxim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Licensed with CC-Attr and GFDL but image description says its a publicity photo. — ↔NMajdan•talk 05:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. A user uploaded an image they took and another editor uploaded a publicity photo over it. I reverted and am going to let the editor of the publicity photo know.↔NMajdan•talk 05:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

 – correct image restored, (c) images deleted. SkierRMH (talk) 04:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright information. Appears to be lifted right out of a clothing catalog.—85.214.56.93 (talk) 09:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by Jennavecia (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims copyright, American University would probably differ. — --Dynaflow babble 09:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure those images are not all Public Domain. Anyway, I can't see any potential use. Rocket000 (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a publicity image uploaded by a WP:SPA using ((GFDL-self)) to circumvent WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 16:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

 – Correct template & FUR added. SkierRMH (talk) 04:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by J.smith (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need comment as to whether it is PD-USGov or a copyrighted registered trademark while IPs keep posting trademark claims. Jusjih (talk) 21:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the registration information from the United States Patent and Trademark Office:

Serial Number: 78641357 Registration Number 3191429 Owner (REGISTRANT): The OSS Society, Inc., 6723 Whittier Ave., 303A McLean, VA 22101 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.210.52 (talk) 19:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trademark and copyright are two completely different balls of wax. Not deleted. Shell ^babelfish 21:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have transwikied this image to Wikimedia Commons with trademark template. Once everything is ready, it can be deleted here.--Jusjih (talk) 02:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I7 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source site has a copyright claim. Need comments as to whether fair use is truly applicable. Jusjih (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image can't be copyrighted. See the discussion page. --Olahus (talk) 10:45, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need OTRS ticket number to support the license claim, please. Jusjih (talk) 21:31, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need OTRS ticket number to support the license claim, please. Jusjih (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once tagged GFDL-no-disclaimers, need comment whether "from family, allowed to distribute" is acceptable. Jusjih (talk) 21:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS ticket number, please? Jusjih (talk) 22:05, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I4 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS number, please? Jusjih (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need evidence of the public domain claim. Jusjih (talk) 23:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need evidence of the public domain claim. Jusjih (talk) 23:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.