- Previous peer review
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
- It might be WP:POV towards the subject.
- It has not been reviewed in any sense for a while, and may not deserve its WP:FA status.
Thanks, Mr. Guye (talk) 01:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
First, I thank you for the work. However, there are some importants comments to be considered:
- The Composition of the General Assembly: The work does not give any comment about whether all countries would be represented or not, or about whether the members of this assembly would be members of the recognized national parliaments or not, whether the vote would be public or not... These information are important to predict the influence and the importance of the given institution... You can also write a table in which you give the full composition of the Assembly according to all possible country repartitions... This will be useful to give countries and audiences more information about this fact.
- Election Standards: This part should be well expanded in order to include a better explanation about all possibilities of the choice of voters... You should include Age Requirements, Affiliation Requirements, Social Requirements, Scientific Requirements...
- General Opinions: You have to include some important quotes explaining the advantages and disadvantages of creating such organization. You can even cite some research papers dealing with this important issue... You can even write two parts about the advantages and disadvantages of the General Assembly
- Place of the assembly: It is also important to include the probable place where such created institutions will meet regularly, whether this place is prestigious or not and give some description to that assembly place.
Yours Sincerely,
--Csisc (talk) 11:23, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]