Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it's informative, well-written, well-interlinked with other articles, and well-referenced. I can't find any problems with it myself, and believe it is Featured Article material.

Thanks, Arran64 (talk) 02:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is missing info on merchandise and on some cultural references. Nergaal (talk) 02:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to checklinks (click "external links" in the toolbox to the right), there are a number of bad external links. Allens (talk | contribs) 00:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• The IPA (I think!) is only a pronunciation of his surname which is a little odd.
• Should the article be forced to display a title of "Chef (South Park)"?
• Don't think you necessarily need to link out to music in the 1970s.
• I would state that the show uses "cutout animation" rather than just assume we'll guess it.
• First sentence of Character section is 58 words long consider chopping it up a bit!
• "... pejorative "crackers", including the children." ref?
• "(and in a few other instances" not keen on "a few".
• Last three sentences of Character section are unreferenced.
• No fair use rationale in place for use of File:Chocolate Salty Balls.jpg.
• Don't link the word "album", it's commonplace.
• "reached #1 in" don't use "hash" to represent "number" in prose.
• "(an unsubtle jab at Scientology)." we both know that's true but (a) that's not neutral or elegant prose (b) it's not referenced.
• Don't link "lightning", commonplace.
• really dead[28]). -> move the ref to after the full stop.
• "having never met the man" -> "never having met Chef"
• Ref 3 needs fixing, both format and dead-wise.
• And ref 6.
• And refs 4 and 5 are tagged as dead.
• What makes collegeprowler.com a reliable source?
• Same question for www.everwonder.com?
• Ref 22 needs to be appropriately formatted.
• Ref 25 incomplete in format and claims to be dead.
• Don't mix date formats in the refs.
• Ref 26 is missing date/accessdate info.
• Ref 29 is incomplete, but we don't use IMDB as it's not a reliable source.

The Rambling Man (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]