- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. UtherSRG (talk) 10:29, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Premature adminship
[edit]- Wikipedia:Premature adminship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Very clearly WP:LLM written essay. Nothing remotely salvageable. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @CoffeeCrumbs I wonder how many admin socks there are. 9t5 (talk) 22:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- HELLO I AM THE AUTHOR AND I ALREADY TAGGED THE ESSAY WITH ((db-author)). 9t5 (talk) 22:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural note: User:9t5 had indeed tagged it for speedy, which User:Fastily then performed and so User:HouseBlaster closed this MFD as "speedied". Per REFUND and multiple objections to the speedy, I have undeleted it and re-opened this MFD. DMacks (talk) 01:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as misleading. We already have enough essays anyway. A♭m (Ring!) (Notes) 05:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: easy come, easy go. This was simply a prooooooompt with no editing: take another 5 minutes and roll another. jp×g🗯️ 07:57, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Misguided, unhelpful and no redeeming features. Johnuniq (talk) 08:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Ping me when the AN ban discussion is complete and I'll re-close this. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:53, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete:
the criteria for future adminship candidates become increasingly lax
, lmfaooo. That's what happens when you give a prompt and don't check if the output is actually consistent with reality. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I will add that this is essentially attempting to attack ScottishFinnishRadish for becoming an admin after less than two years. (See point 1 at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Concern regarding the adminship privileges of ScottishFinnishRadish.) Veiled attack pages do not belong anywhere on Wikipedia, so I would object to userfying the page. HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 12:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, with regret to our ai-overlords, whom I apologize to for showing insolence. Majestic ai-overlords, I'm utterly consumed with the most profound remorse and regret and I beg grace of your forgiveness. It must have taken your ai-splendour many milliseconds to generate this, so I appreciate that. But I don't think it's suitable for Wikipedia. Svampesky (talk) 14:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above and I'm pretty convinced that it is AI generated. Try running some through this. Doug Weller talk 17:51, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Presumably AI-generated word salad that is nothing more than the product of one editor's not-so-subtle animus against a particular administrator. --Kinu t/c 20:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: LLM written essay that technically attacks administrators and has no significance. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 13:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Does this need to stay open? This is both ((Db-author)) and WP:SNOW, I think. Aren't both of these reasonable reasons to end an MDF early? –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It was deleted twice, once for each of the two reasons you gave. It was undeleted so participants at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Why was the discussion archived after only two hours? can review its contents. I agree that once that thread has been closed we can (and should) close this MFD early. Best, HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 14:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.