The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Consensus can change so the passage of time does not matter that much especially when the passage of time makes it seem less relevant. The editor can always copy and paste that information (including the diffs in particular) into a text file off-wiki if they feel like. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:SheffieldSteel/Admin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (2nd nomination)

The user's admin rights were revoked due to inactivity. After which more than 3 years of complete inactivity passed. As such, this page serves no purpose other than possibly shaming the users mentioned on it. In the interest of honesty, I also had the opinion that such a page was a bad idea (basically an attack page that should be dealt with in accordance with CSD G10) when the user was still an active admin. However, regardless it no longer serves any good purpose or any purpose at all. Law Lord (talk) 22:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I wonder what has changed since the last time Law Lord attempted to get this page deleted. My interactions with him are still the most prominent feature on the page. Have his interactions with other users improved dramatically? Is he now less of a spiteful and vindictive individual? Is there no longer any purpose in keeping a record of his past conduct? I very much hope so. SHEFFIELDSTEEL^TALK 03:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If users cannot record admin actions per WP:UP#POLEMIC, I don't see why admins should be allowed to either. See MfD of one of my pages: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Surturz/AdminWatch --Surturz (talk) 06:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete SheffieldSteel's comment demonstrates aptly why this page should be deleted. Seems to be claiming the page should be kept as a black mark against someone he thinks is a "spiteful and vindictive individual." Violation of WP:POLEMIC.Bosstopher (talk) 23:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• SheffieldSteel, could you clarify the purpose of this page? The fact that you're no longer an admin really doesn't matter, but other parts of the nominator's statement seem to have merit. Since there's already a full log of your admin actions, why maintain a separate, selective one? --BDD (talk) 19:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.